Sustainability refers to a human economy and society whose cumulative effects do not crash the biosphere-the planet's life support "operating" system and primary economy, that is, do not violate the ecological integrity of the biosphere.
Sustainable development refers to the economic and societal development path to get from the unsustainable human economy we have now to ultimate sustainability.
Although it is possible to imagine a sustainable economy that does not respect human rights, it is unlikely that a sustainable society could be based on any structural and systematic violation of human rights.
In addition, many instances of unsustainable practices are driven, in the first instance, by human rights violations, that is barriers to people meeting their human needs or otherwise degrading peoples' health and well-being.
It is also unlikely that the society that would perpetuate structural and systematic human rights violations could conceive of the threats and challenges of sustainability in a way sufficient for generating a development path to sustainability success.
Sustainable development and sustainability will require both tapping the collective intelligence of all people, cultures, and ethnicity and their transformation for sustainability. This is impossible without the condition of human rights for all.
In fact, it could be summarized that as ecological integrity is the cornerstone of a sustainable economy, human-rights integrity is the cornerstone of a sustainable society served by that sustainable economy.
Thus, human rights can be seen as the social dimension and integral component of the ecologic-economic integrity required for sustainable development and ultimate sustainability.
It is the socialist term, sustainable development. Sustainable development sacrifices the private property rights of persons to the felt needs of the collective. By presenting the loss of property rights in a supposedly altruistic setting, those rights are slowly eaten away. Sustainability has been the slow encroachment of liberty as socialism has grown by hiding its true goals.
It is the socialist term, sustainable development. Sustainable development sacrifices the private property rights of persons to the felt needs of the collective. By presenting the loss of property rights in a supposedly altruistic setting, those rights are slowly eaten away. Sustainability has been the slow encroachment of liberty as socialism has grown by hiding its true goals.
There is a difference
what is the differences between rights and responsibilities
John C. Redfern has written: 'The new wave millennium, rural economies & human rights' -- subject(s): Human rights, Rural conditions, Rural development, Sustainable development 'The new wave and human rights of constitutional law against the dark age in America' -- subject(s): Civil rights, Secularism
There is a small difference between rights and public issues is simple. Rights involve the individual or small group and public generally involves the whole.
Civil rights refer to the basic rights and freedoms that protect individuals from discrimination based on characteristics like race, gender, or religion. Political rights, on the other hand, relate to participation in the political process, such as the right to vote or run for office. In essence, civil rights guarantee equality and protection under the law, while political rights enable individuals to have a voice in shaping that law.
Nothing they are the same.
power is full of authority while rights is just an access to inter in
a slave has no rights when a metic dos
im wondering the same thing buddy
The difference between statutory and non statutory rights is that one is supplied by the government and the other one isn't. Statutory rights are bestowed by particular government to governed people and are relative to specific cultures and governments