One or many lexemes can belong to same token(category) and when lexeme recognized by a scanner to be in a some category that category returned as the token.
A lexeme is a section of text, which represents a token. For example in case of a number there are many lexemes representing the same token; for example: "12", "14.8" or "1001". Such general tokens are described by patterns of text.
A multiword lexeme is a lexeme made up of a sequence of two or more lexemes that has properties that are not predictable from the properties of the individual lexemes or their normal mode of combination.
this is tedius question.
They had to have a token to ride the ride. A small, inexpensive gift is a token gift.
Tokens is the plural of token
You can't get on the bus without a token.
run
In a token bus network architecture, the nodes at either end of the bus do not actually meet. In a token ring, the network logically functions as a ring, but is wired as a star.
Fddi can be further connected to other networks whereas token ring is individual network of computers.
A multiword lexeme is a lexeme made up of a sequence of two or more lexemes that has properties that are not predictable from the properties of the individual lexemes or their normal mode of combination.
lexeme is a small part of a program used in providing tokens to the source code given by the user
lexeme
nextLine() reads a complete line while next() reads the next token ( a single word)
A zoo token is worth between $2-400,000,000, depending on the age.
An important difference between two traffic shaping algorithms: token bucket throws away tokens when the bucket is full but never discards packets while leaky bucket discards packets when the bucket is full. Unlike leaky bucket, token bucket allows saving, up to maximum size of bucket n. This means that bursts of up to n packets can be sent at once, giving faster response to sudden bursts of input. Leaky bucket forces bursty traffic to smooth out, token bucket permits burstiness but bounds it. Token bucket has no discard or priority policy. Token bucket when compared to leaky bucket, is easy to implement. Each flow needs just a counter to count tokens and a timer to determine when to add new tokens to the counter.
this is tedius question.
Since there is no protocol known as Ethernet Token Ring I assume you are asking about the difference between Ethernet, Token Ring, and Token Bus usage. These are all different protocols, so connecting all three types of networks is not practical. Token Bus networks were an early attempt to get mainframes to connect to terminals through a bus topology structure, utilizing a token for arbitration. Those networks typically ran at 4 Mbps. They were also subject to the same problem as a linear bus structure with Ethernet, which is a break in the cable would bring down the entire network. A later version of Token ring uses a ring topology structure, where a failure in the network will not bring down the entire network. It still uses a token for station arbitration, but can ran at 16 Mbps. Newer versions of HSTR can run at 100 Mbps and there is a standard for a gigabit version. Chances are you will need to bridge between Ethernet and Token Ring (not token bus). For that, you will need a bridge, router, or gateway that can convert between the protocols. In some cases the media is different as well, going from coaxial cable to unshielded twisted pair (UTP). So the difficulties are in correctly converting the protocols between the two, connecting different media types together, and troubleshooting problems between the two networks.
Yes. The only difference between a token and a card is that, as a state based effect, any token that is not in play ceases to exist. (It leaves play like a card, triggering any abilities, then ceases to exist, according to rule 216.3) They are otherwise functionally identical.