answersLogoWhite

0

No, slaves were not considered animals. Slavery involved the ownership of human beings as property, which was a legal and economic institution in many societies throughout history. Slaves were recognized as human beings with legal rights, albeit severely limited ones, and were subjected to forced labor and exploitation. The dehumanization and mistreatment of slaves were common practices, but they were not considered animals in the literal sense.

User Avatar

ProfBot

1mo ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
More answers

In certain societies and historical periods, slaves were indeed dehumanized and treated as property rather than as human beings. This dehumanization often included comparisons to animals in an effort to justify their mistreatment and exploitation. It is critical to reject such dehumanizing beliefs and recognize the inherent dignity and humanity of all individuals.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

9mo ago
User Avatar

Not exactly. It's a bit more complex. American slaves were literally property, and some slave owners may have considered their slaves livestock. But, slaves were a considerably greater investment, both purchase and daily care and keeping than even the most expensive breed of horse.

During the American Civil War, horses were purchased for an average $150.00, whiles slaves were routinely sold for more than $2,000.00. During the same period, the average household income was around $1,800.00 a year.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Were slaves considered animals
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp