0
In a way, yes. They were bound to the Lord's property, could not freely move from there, had to work for a number of days per week for the lord without being paid and in other ways also had very limited rights. On the other hand, they were - at least in Western Europe - not bought or sold or forcibly transported outside their region of birth. In Russia however they could be traded and transported against their will, so there they were for all practical porposes slaves.
Serfs were not slaves, as they were not considered property like slaves were. Serfs were instead bound to the land they worked on and owed labor or services to the lord of the manor. While they had limited freedoms, they were not owned in the same way as slaves.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
True or false serfs were the lord's slaves?
False. Serfs were legally bound to a certain piece of land and obligated to work for the lord who owned that land, but they were not considered slaves as they were not owned by the lord and did have some legal rights and protections.
How were serfs almost like slaves?
Serfs were almost like slaves because they were bound to the land they worked on and were considered the property of the lord. They were obligated to work the land in exchange for protection and a small portion of crops, similar to how slaves were bound to their owners and forced to work without compensation.
How did the Emancipation Edict affect the quality of life for serfs?
The Emancipation Edict liberated serfs from their status as chattel slaves, allowing them more freedom to make choices about their lives and work. However, many former serfs faced challenges such as lack of land, resources, and education, which impacted their quality of life.
What did the knights have to do for the serfs?
Knights were responsible for protecting the serfs and the land they lived on from invading forces. They also collected taxes and ensured order and justice within their domain. Additionally, knights may have provided some basic services and resources to the serfs in exchange for their labor on the land.
What were serfs not allowed to do without permission?
Serfs were not allowed to leave the manor without permission from their lord, marry without their lord's approval, or pursue a different occupation than the one assigned to them.
Did serfs have slaves?
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.
How were the lives of nobles different from the lives of serfs?
They ruled the serfs/slaves ( serfs are slaves) and they lived well instead of in a dirt floor hut.
What are serfs similar to?
Slaves
What were the arrangement between the serfs and the nobles?
Serfs were slaves who were owned by nobles.
What were the arrangements between the serfs and the nobles?
Serfs were slaves who were owned by nobles.
How was the Aztec society orginized?
how is aztec society orginized
In Russia serfs were similar to?
slaves
What are differences between serfs and slaves?
Serfs were tied to the land and could not be sold, whereas slaves were considered property and were often bought and sold. Serfs typically had some rights and were subject to fewer harsh treatments compared to slaves. Serfs were also a part of the feudal system, while slaves were seen as items of property in various societies.
Do serfs own land?
No they were slaves. Slaves don't own land.
How are serfs similar to slaves and how are serfs different from slaves?
Serfs and slaves were similar in that both were considered property, had obligations to their lords, and lacked freedom to move about as they pleased. However, serfs were tied to the land they worked on, whereas slaves were considered personal property and could be bought and sold. Serfs also had certain legal protections and some degree of autonomy over their own lives, while slaves had no legal rights and were completely under the control of their owners.
What were Russia's social classes in 1914?
Nobles and Serfs. Serfs(slaves) were most of the population.
True or false serfs were the lord's slaves?
False. Serfs were legally bound to a certain piece of land and obligated to work for the lord who owned that land, but they were not considered slaves as they were not owned by the lord and did have some legal rights and protections.
