The Southerners knew that the North or the Union wanted to abolish slavery. With the growing friction between the South and the North, they threatened to secede if a Republican became president, which happened when Aberham Lincoln became president. The Southerners feared that their rich southern way of life would end.
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
Many southerners in the mid-1800s viewed the North with suspicion and resentment. They saw the North as economically and politically dominant, and believed that its growing industrial power threatened the traditional agrarian way of life in the South. Southerners also resented what they perceived as interference by the North in their institution of slavery.
South wanted to keep slaves, north didn't want slavery to continue
The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
The Southerners knew that the North or the Union wanted to abolish slavery. With the growing friction between the South and the North, they threatened to secede if a Republican became president, which happened when Aberham Lincoln became president. The Southerners feared that their rich southern way of life would end.
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
No- not all Southerners were pro-slavery, just like not all Northerners were anti-slavery.
The South looked at slavery as an economic issue. The North viewed slavery as a moral issue. In the North, slavery was proving to be unprofitable in the North and was dying out by the end of the American Revolution, but in the South white Southerners were increasingly more defensive of slavery.
The South looked at slavery as an economic issue. The North viewed slavery as a moral issue. In the North, slavery was proving to be unprofitable in the North and was dying out by the end of the American Revolution, but in the South white Southerners were increasingly more defensive of slavery.
Many southerners in the mid-1800s viewed the North with suspicion and resentment. They saw the North as economically and politically dominant, and believed that its growing industrial power threatened the traditional agrarian way of life in the South. Southerners also resented what they perceived as interference by the North in their institution of slavery.
South wanted to keep slaves, north didn't want slavery to continue
Southerners reacted negatively to abolitionists because they saw them as a threat to their economic and social way of life, which depended heavily on slavery. They viewed abolitionists as undermining their property rights and inciting slave revolts. This led to heightened tensions between the North and the South in the years leading up to the Civil War.
The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.
The South banned the book because it attacked the institution of slavery and criticised slave-owners. In the North, the book caused people to take an interest in the slavery issue for the first time. It brought many new recruits to the cause of Abolitionism, and aroused support for the Underground Railroad.
Both. It died out in the North, because it did not fit the factory system. It would have died out in the South, but the invention of the cotton-gin enabled the growth of huge plantations that depended on slave-labour.