Southern pro-slavery whites argued that slavery was a necessary economic institution that was vital to the Southern way of life. They believed that slavery was justified by the Bible and that it was beneficial for both slaves and slave owners. Additionally, they argued that African Americans were inferior and better off under the care of white slave owners.
Many southerners believed slavery was necessary for their economic success as it provided a cheap labor force for plantations. They also justified it using racial and religious beliefs that portrayed African Americans as inferior and destined to be slaves. Additionally, the institution of slavery had been normalized and entrenched in southern society for generations.
it was critical for the south's agricultural economy.
Southern slave owners generally viewed slavery as essential to their economic prosperity, social hierarchy, and way of life. They believed that slavery was a natural and necessary institution, and that it provided the foundation for the region's agricultural economy. Many slave owners also used racism to justify the subjugation of African slaves, considering them inferior beings who needed to be controlled and guided.
Freelanders objected to slavery because they believed it was morally wrong to enslave another human being, that it violated the principles of equality and human rights. They also argued that allowing slavery to expand into new territories would threaten the economic opportunities of free white laborers.
Southern planters believed that if slaves learned to read, it would weaken the system of slavery.
the Southern planters thought that slavery shouldn't be ended for they needed the slaves for their crops
pp
Northern workers opposed slavery; southern planters support it
It wages call
It wages call
Southern planters opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, threatening their economic interests and political power. They feared it would upset the delicate balance between free and slave states, potentially leading to the abolition of slavery in the United States.
Yes planters supported slavery. They did so because slaves were free labor and they needed them to work the fields.
Yeoman farmers resented rich planters because they wielded significant economic and political power. However, they still supported slavery because they believed it was essential for maintaining the social and economic hierarchy that benefited them as white landowners. Slavery provided them with a cheap labor source and allowed them to compete economically with the planters.
You have to understand the war had VERY LITTLE to do with slavery.
1828 and 1832 Congress passes tariffs on important goods which benefit northern manufactures but hurt southern planters.
Slavery wasn't just "weakened" after the Civil War. Slavery was abolished by the Civil War, and by President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation.