Firearms should be allowed because it embraces a U.S. citizen's right to have freedom. For example, some people enjoy handling a firearm for a job, and teaching people interested in physics how the item works. I would NOT call this item a "weapon" outside of a war. I would more likely call it a tool that helps fellow Americans have just another right to use. there are also protection issues in worse parts of the U.S. that someone may require a firearm, especially with the issue about gangs. thank you for taking time to read this answer
Because the majority of voters feel they should be allowed.
yes
No, he HATES GUNS, his policy states that ALL guns should be taken away from someone. Obama on the otherh and belives that the citizen should have a right to weapons.
Yes. Criminals should not have guns. Normal, law abiding people, despite age, gender, race or religious preference should be allowed to own guns, and should chose whether or not they want to. No one should make the choice for them.
Yes. Taking guns away from law abiding citizens does nothing to improve crime.
NO! Do NOT bring guns to school unless you are a police officer! Think of those kids.
In Canada, the kinds of guns that shops are allowed to carry for sale are only hand guns and semi-automatic guns. Fully automatic guns are not allowed to be sold.
No. Children, many mentally disabled people, criminals, and other mentally insane people should not be allowed to have guns for fear of them hurting others or fear of having to kill them to prevent harm to others.
You have to go to the imvu catalog and buy a gun and then go into a room (where guns are allowed) and you get your gun and it should say "shoot" and you shoo.
guns?? I don't even think your allowed guns!
Provided they have the proper supervision and education regarding the weapons, there is no reason why not.
potato guns are not allowed to fire projectiles. that would make them illegal, but you can have one