Zayah hits bills
The senete
popular sovereignty
popular sovereignty
southern secessoin
Fugitive slave law
Missouri's request for statehood touched off a sectional crisis between the northern, non-slave states and the south, slave holding states. The crisis was whether Missouri any states in general would become slave holding states or not.The promblems did Missouris request for statehood cause is Missouris request for statehood touched off a sectional crisis between the northern non-slave state and the south. Slave holding states. The crisis was wheather Missouri any states in general would become slave holding states or not.
I want to say the big question was whether or not the state was anti-slavery or not. It was always about maintaining the balance. For every anti-slavery state there would have to be an arrangement to have a pro-slavery state.
The main purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was to give voters in each of the two territories the right to vote on whether slavery would be allowed before the territories applied for statehood.
Around the mid 1800s, several states tried to be admitted into the union. This caused tension between the north and south since they had such varying views on slavery. When California applied for statehood, it only exemplified the differences between the two regions since they felt so strongly on whether slavery should or shouldn't be allowed.
Whether or not it was a war about slavery (debatable), it did result in the ending of slavery.
I don't think that any of the current unincorporated U. S. territories have requested statehood to date. However, on November 6, 2012, Puerto Rico voted on whether their status should be independence, free association, or statehood. 61.15% voted for statehood.
In 1854, Congress enacted the Kansas-Nebraska Act. This was a controversial law in that it dealt with slavery. Slavery was a sensitive issue in the US at this time, almost seven years before the US Civil War. Under the Act, citizens of territories about to apply for statehood, would vote on whether slavery would be legal or not. This put an end to the Missouri Compromise of 1850. It disolved the Whig Party and laid seeds for a new political Party, the Republican Party. Republicans opposed slavery. The Act was a product of Senator Douglas' popular sovereignty policy.
In the 1848 election, the Whigs and Democrats were forced to take a stand on slavery because the issue of the expansion of slavery into new territories was becoming increasingly contentious. The Mexican-American war had recently ended, and there was a disagreement over whether slavery should be allowed in the newly acquired territory. This forced both parties to address the issue of slavery in their platforms and appeal to the different factions within their parties.
Lincoln argued that it was wrong to decide whether to allow slavery in a state or territory by voting
utah and mexico
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
douglas argued for the right of states to decide whether or not to allow slavery