Zayah hits bills
Chat with our AI personalities
Missouri's application for statehood in 1819 raised the issue of whether slavery should be allowed in the new state, leading to fierce debates in Congress about the balance of power between free and slave states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 emerged as a temporary resolution, allowing Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state while Maine entered as a free state, and prohibiting slavery in the unorganized territories north of the 36°30’ parallel.
The theory promoted by Stephen Douglas was popular sovereignty. This theory allowed the people of a territory to decide for themselves whether to allow or forbid slavery when they applied for statehood, as outlined in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
The issue of slavery in the territory ceded by Mexico was decided by the Compromise of 1850, which allowed residents to determine whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This meant that the territories of New Mexico and California could decide on the slavery issue for themselves when applying for statehood.
Popular sovereignty-_-Apex
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 proposed to use popular sovereignty to determine whether the territories of Kansas and Nebraska would allow slavery or not. This meant that the residents of each territory would vote on whether to permit slavery, which ultimately led to heightened tensions and violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed voters in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. This overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which prohibited slavery in territories north of a certain latitude.