1. compound microscope has higher magnification power
2. Dissecting is used for studying 'big' objects
3. compound is for looking at cells, etc.
Chat with our AI personalities
One advantage of using a dissecting microscope over a compound light microscope is that it provides a larger working distance between the specimen and the objective lens. This allows for easier manipulation and observation of thicker, larger samples.
On a dissecting microscope, you view larger, three-dimensional specimens, such as organisms or parts of organisms like insects or plants, at low magnification. On a compound microscope, you view smaller, thinner specimens, such as cells or tissues, at higher magnification and in two dimensions.
Both dissecting and compound light microscopes are tools used in laboratory settings. They both allow for the examination of objects that are too small to be seen with the naked eye. Additionally, they both provide detailed and magnified views of specimens for observation and analysis.
A stereo-microscope provides a 3D view of the specimen and is used for examining larger objects with lower magnification levels. In contrast, a compound light microscope offers higher magnification levels and is used for viewing smaller specimens in 2D. Additionally, a compound light microscope has a more complex optical system with multiple lenses compared to a stereo-microscope.
The maximum resolution of a compound microscope is approximately 0.2 micrometers, also known as 200 nanometers. This is the smallest distance between two objects that can still be distinguished as separate entities when viewed through the microscope.