Yes, he chose to take drugs with the full knowledge of what they do to a person and for that he is responsible for anything he does while intoxicated
It can be argued that a drug addict is not fully morally responsible for their actions when they are under the influence of drugs, as their decision-making capabilities may be impaired. However, seeking help and taking steps towards recovery can help regain control and accountability over their actions.
Legally, it would depend on the exact legislation. Morally, almost certainly
Morally, yes. Legally, it's less certain, and good luck getting it even if technically they are.
The best strategy for overcoming tobacco addiction is to exercise iron self control and just don't smoke. Eventually the urge to smoke will fade. If your self control isn't that good, you can use some other, less harmful form of nicotine (patches, chewing gum, or e-cigarettes), but if you do you will still be a nicotine addict even if you are no longer a tobacco addict.
no but her dad was and still is
yes, there is. Some would argue that the taking of life (killing someone) is morally wrong. A counter-argument might be if in self-defence, the taking of a life might be morally right, since it preserves another's life. However, this does not contradict the point that the taking of a life is still morally wrong. Indeed, the taking of a life can be both morally right and morally wrong.
Yes, but God would rather you change your ways.
It is unknown if religion builds up organization and values in society or if it is just common in all societies. However, we do know that preexisting societies have become nonreligious and still remain organized
No. Being pregnant/giving birth does not emancipate a minor in any state of the US. You are still subject to the control and authority of your parents, and your parents are still responsible for you.
You are not emancipated until your 18th birthday, until that time your parents are responsible for you.
Child support payments are usually awarded as part of a Divorce Decree in a court of law. If the minor "father" and the girl were never married, then he is morally responsible for providing proper support for the child. There is a price to pay for making whoopee ... the kids never think of that when romping in the sheets.
There not anything "wrong" with that morally or legally, especially if they are still paying for it. Generally though a parent will hand it over to their child once they consider them responsible enough to handle it themselves.