The Connecticut Compromise was reached at the convention regarding slavery
In addition to the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Constitutional Convention also reached the Slave Trade Compromise. This agreement allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue for twenty years after the ratification of the Constitution, after which Congress could legislate against it. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slavery for their economy, with the growing abolitionist sentiments in the North.
There was only one compromise regarding slavery and it was the three-fifths compromise which stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of assigning House of Representative seats. Another compromise during the Constitutional convention was the Great compromise which created a bicameral legislature and the creation of the electoral college for Presidential elections.
1850 Comprimise
Regarding the Hayes-Tilden situation, this was the compromise that was reached. Hayes would be elected President, but in return he had to release the last southern states from Reconstruction.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
The three fifths compromise
The Connecticut Compromise was reached at the Constitutional Convention that took place in 1787. It was a compromise regarding the representation each state was entitled to under the US Constitution.
In addition to the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Constitutional Convention also reached the Slave Trade Compromise. This agreement allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue for twenty years after the ratification of the Constitution, after which Congress could legislate against it. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slavery for their economy, with the growing abolitionist sentiments in the North.
There was only one compromise regarding slavery and it was the three-fifths compromise which stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of assigning House of Representative seats. Another compromise during the Constitutional convention was the Great compromise which created a bicameral legislature and the creation of the electoral college for Presidential elections.
There is a lot of information online regarding the Compromise of 1877. Wikipedia has an entire page dedicated to the Compromise of 1877 and it is reliable.
The Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise, was primarily authored by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, both delegates from Connecticut, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This compromise resolved the debate between larger and smaller states regarding legislative representation, establishing a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House and equal representation in the Senate.
Yes, the terms "Connecticut Compromise" and "Great Compromise" are appropriate as they both refer to the same agreement that established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of large and small states. The term "Three-Fifths Compromise," often labeled a "sectional compromise," accurately reflects the contentious agreement between northern and southern states regarding the counting of enslaved individuals for representation and taxation. Both terms highlight the compromises made to address differing regional interests during the Constitutional Convention.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
No. Slavery is no longer legal in America, therefore dismissing the compromise which stated that slaves were counted as 3/5th of a person regarding representation and taxation for states.
1850 Comprimise
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives.
i dont konw