At least one parent would have to have an RH Positive blood type. Beyond that you can not tell. Because the O trait is a recessive trait, either parent could have A or B or O blood, since, for example, a parent with A blood could have one A gene and one O gene that together would express the A trait. That parent's child could inherit either the A gene or the O gene. The other parent could have B based upon one B gene and one O gene that together would express the B trait. That other parent's child could inherit either the B gene or the O gene. Only if the child of both parents inherited an O gene from each parent, would the child have O blood. As to the RH factor, it is a dominant trait, so that if the child has the trait expressed, it would have to have been in one of the two parents. Hope this helps.
The person is homozygous for the trait
If one parent is homozygous dominant for all traits (carrying two dominant alleles for each trait), and the other parent is heterozygous (carrying one dominant and one recessive allele for each trait), there would be a 100% chance that the baby would inherit the dominant alleles from the homozygous dominant parent. Therefore, the baby would also be heterozygous for all the traits, carrying one dominant and one recessive allele for each trait.
The child will inherit one allele from each parent. Since the mother is homozygous dominant (AA) and the father is homozygous recessive (aa), the child will inherit one dominant allele from the mother and one recessive allele from the father, resulting in a heterozygous genotype (Aa).
They inherited a T (tall) allele from the tall parent, and a t (short) allele from the short parent. This is only if we assume that both parents are homozygous, which the short parent would need to be for the short trait to show. If this is true, then the F1 generation would show the tall trait 4/4 times, and would end up with the genotype Tt 4/4 times.
It is illegal for a parent to put a tattoo on a 10 year old minor child. CPS needs to be notified.
A dominant trait is part of genetics in which a trait will appear in an offspring if one parent contributes it. For example, if one parent contributes the dominant trait of dark hair and the other contributes the recessive trait of light hair, the offspring would have dark hair.
Except in rare cases, you can only inherit one allele per parent per trait (for those of you that don't know, that's two alleles). A recessive trait will be shown if both alleles are for said recessive trait. If one of the alleles is for a dominant trait, then the dominant trait will show. Some genes are tied to environment and exposure to certain things, so a trait may be 'masked' for the duration of a person/organism's life, or at least until they are exposed to it. For example, an allergy to plastic would not be apparent in someone living in Africa unless by chance they came into contact with a plastic bucket, plastic hairbrush, etc., from, say, a visiting doctor from America.
It would clearly be illegal. No one is allowed to tattoo without a license. And no one may tattoo a minor. There is an exception to cover an existing tattoo where a parent may take a 16 or 17 year old to a tattoo parlor.
I'm not your parent and I'm telling you, don't get a tattoo when you're 14.I dont know for sure which ones will, but if your sure you want a tattoo; it is your body nobody can stop you.New Answer:I think any tattoo parlor would let you get one IF you have a PARENT with you and they are willing to sign .
No, it is illegal to tattoo anyone under the age of 18 in Wisconsin, even if the parents would consent.
In a pedigree designed to study a recessive sex-linked trait, affected individuals are more commonly male because they inherit the trait on their X chromosome from their carrier mother. Females need to inherit two copies of the gene (one from each parent) to be affected. The trait skips generations and can be passed down from carrier females to affected males.