This is too complicated to answer as written. First what do you mean by "hit"?
The effect wold depend on several variables, some of which are:
For a subsurface burst nearby at medium to large yield, even highly reinforced concrete buildings would collapse. Such bursts were designed to destroy underground missile silos, which are about as blast resistant as possible.
Airbursts, even of very high yield directly above a reinforced concrete building are likely to do little damage.
Cockroaches are known for their resilience and ability to survive extreme conditions, but it is unlikely that they would survive a nuclear explosion due to the intense heat, pressure, and radiation levels produced. The blast would likely be lethal to them.
Underground bunkers or shelters specifically designed to withstand nuclear blasts and radiation would be the most likely to survive a nuclear war. These structures provide protection from the initial explosion and fallout, increasing the chances of survival for those inside.
It is highly unlikely that anything directly at the site of a nuclear blast would survive due to the extreme heat, pressure, and radiation. However, some organisms like extremophiles have shown the capability to survive in extremely harsh conditions and may have a chance of surviving indirectly through protective mechanisms.
There is no definitive "safest" place in London to survive a nuclear bomb as the impact would be widespread. However, underground structures such as the London Underground network or purpose-built nuclear shelters may provide some level of protection from initial blast and radiation effects. It is important to follow official guidance in the event of a nuclear attack.
If a nuclear bomb were to hit a school, it would result in catastrophic destruction and loss of life. The blast would cause severe damage to the school building and surrounding areas, potentially causing fires and releasing harmful radiation. The impact would be devastating and result in widespread casualties.
Cockroaches would survive a nuclear war. Since lawyers are an even lower life-form they should too.
A direct nuclear blast - nothing. However it is said that cockroaches would possibly survive radiation where other animals would be killed.
No, a scorpion would not survive a nuclear explosion due to the extreme heat, pressure, and radiation that would be generated. The blast would likely obliterate the scorpion instantly.
Cockroaches are known for their resilience and ability to survive extreme conditions, but it is unlikely that they would survive a nuclear explosion due to the intense heat, pressure, and radiation levels produced. The blast would likely be lethal to them.
Probably.
It is a myth that roaches could survive a nuclear bomb. The heat would evaporate them.
Not building them in earthquake zones would be one way.
Underground bunkers or shelters specifically designed to withstand nuclear blasts and radiation would be the most likely to survive a nuclear war. These structures provide protection from the initial explosion and fallout, increasing the chances of survival for those inside.
That would certainly be a huge surprise to Halifax residents!- - Most of them still seem to think Halifax is part of Canada
To do that it would have to have CBRN protection levels i.e. be sealed from CBRN threats. Older tanks wouldn't survive by a longshot, newer tanks might be able to, depends on model.
the whole world would die, directly from the blast, the shockwave or nuclear radition. every piece of food would be contaminated so even if you did survive there would be nothing to eat or drink.
It is highly unlikely that anything directly at the site of a nuclear blast would survive due to the extreme heat, pressure, and radiation. However, some organisms like extremophiles have shown the capability to survive in extremely harsh conditions and may have a chance of surviving indirectly through protective mechanisms.