0
How much could a magistrate make for ruling on run away slave cases?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
i really dont knoeee
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Alondra rodriguez
Magistrates in the antebellum South could be paid varying amounts for ruling on runaway slave cases, from a small fee to a larger stipend depending on local laws and customs. In some cases, magistrates may have received additional compensation or incentives for ruling in favor of slave owners.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How much can a magistrate make for ruling on runaway slave cases?
Magistrates typically did not receive a fixed salary for ruling on runaway slave cases. Instead, they were often compensated for their time spent on such cases, with the amount varying depending on the specific circumstances and location.
How did the fugitive slave law of 1850 reward judges?
The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 allowed judges to receive a higher fee for ruling in favor of slaveholders seeking the return of escaped slaves. This financial incentive motivated judges to comply with and enforce the provisions of the law.
What was the punishment for someone who helped a runaway slave?
The punishment for someone who helped a runaway slave varied depending on the time and place, but it could include fines, imprisonment, or even physical punishment. In some cases, those found guilty of aiding runaway slaves could face severe consequences such as being sold into slavery themselves.
What did a slave have to do to be free?
A slave could be freed through different means, such as being granted manumission by their owner, purchasing their freedom, or being granted freedom by the government. In some cases, slaves could earn their freedom through exceptional service or through self-purchase agreements.
How long did a slave have to work before they could be free?
The amount of time a slave had to work before they could be free varied depending on factors such as location and laws. In some cases, slaves could work for a set period of time, such as 7 or 10 years, before gaining their freedom. In other cases, slaves could be granted freedom as a reward for exceptional service or through legal means such as manumission.
What was the legal reasoning behind the ruling from Dred Scott v Sanford?
To decide the question of whether a slave who had spent some time on free soil (where he could automatically have claimed his freedom) could apply for it when he was back in slave country.
What were the slaves of ancient Rome rights?
Slaves were property; they had no rights. However that does not mean that they had no recourse, although difficult. If a slave were in an extremely abusive or inhumane situation, he could try to get to a sympathetic magistrate and have the magistrate take up his cause. He could also get to certain temple sites which were sanctuaries for abused slaves. He had some legal standing as he was allowed to testify in court and even the farm slaves were required to be provided by a new tunic every year and a cloak and shoes every two years. If a master turned a slave out because of illness or age, he was automatically freed. Under the imperial rule a slave could not be killed or mutilated. Then too, if a slave were rented out or loaned to someone and the person injured the slave, or in some other way abused him, the master could take the offender to court for damaging his property and by this act avenge the slave.
Where could you get a slave?
You could get a slave at a slavemarket
How was slave life shaped by the slave's relationship with there owner?
Well, many of the slave owners developed relationships with the slave to such a degree that many of the slaves didn't want to return home once slavery was abolished. They were treated better and a slave could even be promoted e.g. However, these cases were rare and the slave was treated extremely badly.
In the slave trade how could a slave be promoted?
They could be freed.
What controversial US Supreme Court ruling held African Americans had no rights and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories?
The verdict in the Dred Scott case - denying the right of a slave to claim his freedom retrospectively, after having lived on free soil but then returned to slave country.
How would someone survive as a slave?
The slave could work and get payed and buy there self out. The slave could work normally and live. The slave could escape to Canada and live.
What did the supreme court ruling the dred Scott case establish?
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
What is the qutub minar was ruling dynasty that built it?
Sheikh Qutub-ud-in Bakhtiyar of slave dynasty built it
What could a slave owner do to a slave?
beat him to a pulp
Where slave children used as foot warmers?
Most likely not in most cases, if you could afford a slave you could afford another blanket, or a foot warmer. NOT to say that it never happened, and it may have been considered a kindness or even an indulgence to the child, as in doing so you would allow them sleep on the bed.
How did the dread Scott decision upset the north?
It upset them because the ruling basically made stated that Congress could not outlaw slavery anywhere because slaves where property of the slave owner, and therefore protected by the 5th amendment.
