0
In the mid-1800s, debate over slavery increased as abolitionists organized to challenge slavery in the United States.
Please press helpful if it helped
thanks
What else can I help you with?
What event might you attend if you were an abolitionist?
You might attend an anti-slavery rally or protest advocating for the abolition of slavery.
Where might you find slavery now?
Slavery is still alive and well and rearing its ugly head in many impoverished countries, although their governments would NEVER admit to it, people still sell their children in countries like India and Pakistan, China, countries in Africa, it is a scurge upon this planet, but there you have it!
Why might have anti- slavery advocates of 1861 invoked Joel Barlow to decry the evils of Slavery?
Anti-slavery advocates of 1861 may have invoked Joel Barlow because of his strong anti-slavery views and his efforts to work towards the abolition of slavery in early American society. Barlow was known for his writings and speeches denouncing the institution of slavery and advocating for equal rights for all individuals, making him an influential figure in the anti-slavery movement of his time. By referencing Barlow's works, advocates could draw attention to the moral and ethical arguments against slavery and inspire others to join the cause for abolition.
What did northerners fear southerners slave owners might do?
Use slave labor to take over Northern industries...jrc
What did the northerners fear southerners slave owners might do?
Northerners feared that Southern slave owners might expand slavery into new territories and states, potentially increasing the political power of slave states and threatening the balance of power between free and slave states in the United States. They also feared that the economic interests of Southern slave owners would dominate national policies, leading to the spread of slavery in the country.
How might the conflict in northern Ireland affect the future of the united kingdom?
because you are crazy
How might the political attacks between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the federalist and democratic republican parties lead to the problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the federalists and democratics - republican parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the Federalist and democratic republican parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the federalist and democratic republicans parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the federalists and democratic republicans parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between federalist and democratic republican party lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the federalists and democrats - republicans parties lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
How might the political attacks between the Federalist and Democratic Republican Party lead to problems in the future?
There might be a separation of governments or a 3rd party might be added to settle conflict.
Why did why people supported the creation of the United Nations in 1945?
hope that international cooperation might prevent future global conflict
How was popular sovereignty appealing as a solution to the emotional debate about the future of slavery in the united state?
It was a cop-out. It allowed the federal government to wash its hands of the affair. It was supposed to be fair, but only ended up with Bleeding Kansas (as you might know). All other compromises had failed and this was just an effort to avoid heightening the tension further.
