answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

About 10700000000000000000000000 h bombs

This is a complicated function of:

  • yields
  • locations of bursts
  • material around bursts
  • etc.

It would be far far easier to just blow away the atmosphere and leave the earth alone and even far far easier to light firestorms in all the forests and fill the stratosphere with soot for decades causing nuclear winter.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

It is impossible to determine an exact number, but it would likely require thousands of nuclear bombs detonated simultaneously to cause catastrophic global destruction. The impact would depend on various factors such as the size and power of the bombs, their distribution, and the targeted areas.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How many nuclear bombs would it take to blow up the world?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

Can a nuke blow up the world?

No, a single nuclear bomb does not have the capability to blow up the entire world. However, it can cause massive destruction and loss of life in the targeted area. Multiple nuclear bombs used simultaneously could have catastrophic global consequences.


Which bomb is more dangerous a nuclear bomb or an atomic bomb?

A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate


Why do countries use nuclear bombs?

Countries may possess nuclear weapons for various reasons, including deterrence against potential adversaries, ensuring national security, and projecting military power. The idea is that possessing nuclear capability can deter other countries from attacking, as the consequences of a nuclear conflict are too catastrophic to justify the use of nuclear weapons.


Could a nuclear weapon blow up a continent?

No, a single nuclear weapon is not powerful enough to blow up an entire continent. The destructive power of a nuclear weapon is concentrated in a relatively small area known as the blast radius. The impact would be devastating locally, but the effect would not extend to an entire continent.


Can a nuclear bomb or reaction blow up a whole state?

It is unlikely for a nuclear bomb or reaction to blow up a whole state. The explosive power of a nuclear bomb is devastating, but the physical size of a typical state is much larger. The impact of a nuclear explosion would be significant within a certain radius, but it would not cover an entire state.

Related questions

How many nuclear bombs can blow up the earth?

It would depend on the size of the bomb.


Why woundn't anyone drop the atomic bomb to end life on earth?

Your question assumes someone would not blow up the world with atomic bombs. That is a fallacy. There are a few humans in this world who would be insane enough to issue enough nuclear bombs in order to destroy the world. They would not be considered "sane rational people" by the rest of the world. Humanity wants to preserve itself. Therefore people are not inclined to "blow up the world". If a poll was taken around the world you would probably learn that people do not want to end the world via nuclear elimination. They want to live and enjoy peace around the world. That is why people would NOT blow up the world with atomic weapons.


How many bombs would it take to blow up the sun?

To say how many nuclear bombs it would take to blow up the sun is almost impossible. Actually the sun is a continuously exploding thermonuclear bomb, that's where the energy comes from - fusion. It doesn't matter how many bombs you shot into the sun, it would just get hotter.


How many nuclear bombs would it take to blow up the US?

depends on how big the bombs are, if they were as big as Tsar Bomba (Soviet bomb 60MT) it would take about from 15-25 no you retard it would take about 15-25 to blow the usa NT the us it would take 10 a-bombs to kill every living thing (cuz of the radiation)


How many nuclear bombs would it take to blow up earth?

It is impossible to accurately estimate the number of nuclear bombs it would take to completely destroy Earth as the amount would be so vast that it is beyond comprehension. Using nuclear bombs to destroy Earth would also have catastrophic consequences for all life on the planet.


How many nuclear bombs would it take to blow up the moon?

It is impossible to blow up the Moon with nuclear bombs as it is too massive and its gravity would likely prevent such an event from happening. Additionally, any attempt to do so would have catastrophic consequences for Earth due to the debris and environmental impact.


How many nuclear bombs does it take to blow up Pluto?

It is impossible to blow up Pluto with nuclear bombs, as it is a dwarf planet located over 3.6 billion miles away from Earth. Additionally, the use of nuclear weapons in space is banned by international laws and treaties.


What would happen if there is another World War involving nuclear weapons?

the world will blow up


Can a nuke blow up the world?

No, a single nuclear bomb does not have the capability to blow up the entire world. However, it can cause massive destruction and loss of life in the targeted area. Multiple nuclear bombs used simultaneously could have catastrophic global consequences.


What happens if you microwave a cockroach?

actually i think they are not because roaches can survive nuclear bombs so i think microwaves will be no prblem


How many nuclear bombs would it take to blow up long island?

This question is too complex to be answered here as written, it depends on:your definition of "blow up"bomb yields availableburst heights/depthsetc. for dozens of additional variables


Which bomb is more dangerous a nuclear bomb or an atomic bomb?

A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate