Vagueness and ambiquity can have an impact on an argument or claim due to the lack of information. excess vagueness ban be called vagoe comparison and needs more information to state a claim.
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
An explanation provides information, while an argument uses evidence to support a claim.
Claim, evidence, and reasoning (CER) is a structured framework used to develop scientific arguments and communicate ideas clearly. A claim is a statement or assertion that answers a question or addresses a problem. Evidence consists of data, facts, or observations that support the claim, while reasoning connects the evidence to the claim, explaining why the evidence is relevant and how it supports the assertion. Together, these components help create a logical and persuasive argument.
The term "concede" generally means to acknowledge or accept something as true, often reluctantly. It can refer to admitting defeat in a competition or recognizing the validity of another's argument or point of view. In various contexts, it implies a yielding or giving up of a claim or position.
The word claim is only 1 syllable.
SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY This answer is supported on page 50.
The argument from silence fallacy occurs when someone assumes that a statement is true because there is no evidence or information to the contrary. This can impact the validity of an argument by making it weak or unreliable, as the absence of evidence does not necessarily prove the truth of a claim.
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
Semantic ambiguity
A claim is a statement that asserts a belief or position, while an argument is a set of reasons presented in support of that claim. In other words, a claim is the main point being made, and an argument provides the rationale or evidence to persuade others of the validity of that claim.
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
Misplacing the burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim but expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. This impacts the validity of an argument because the burden of proof should always be on the person making the claim. Without proper evidence, the argument lacks credibility and cannot be considered valid.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
the absence of relative words does not automatically immunize a claim from undesirable vagueness.
The main argument
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
Every argument should have a claim or thesis, evidence to support the claim, and reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim. Arguments are structured to persuade others of a particular viewpoint or position.