Vagueness and ambiquity can have an impact on an argument or claim due to the lack of information. excess vagueness ban be called vagoe comparison and needs more information to state a claim.
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
The two basic parts of an argument are the claim and the evidence. The claim is the main assertion or position being put forward, while the evidence consists of the facts, statistics, or reasoning used to support that claim. Together, they form the foundation of a persuasive argument, allowing the speaker or writer to effectively communicate their viewpoint.
An explanation provides information, while an argument uses evidence to support a claim.
Argument refers to a reasoned statement or claim that presents a viewpoint or position on a particular issue. Support involves providing evidence, examples, or reasoning that bolsters the argument, making it more convincing. Together, they form the basis of persuasive communication, where the argument lays out the main idea, and the support reinforces it to persuade the audience.
A congruent argument is one where the premises logically support the conclusion, resulting in a coherent and consistent line of reasoning. In such arguments, the premises are aligned with the conclusion, reinforcing its validity. This alignment often enhances the persuasive power of the argument, making it more compelling to the audience. Essentially, a congruent argument presents a unified and harmonious case for its claim.
SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY This answer is supported on page 50.
The argument from silence fallacy occurs when someone assumes that a statement is true because there is no evidence or information to the contrary. This can impact the validity of an argument by making it weak or unreliable, as the absence of evidence does not necessarily prove the truth of a claim.
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
A claim is a statement that asserts a belief or position, while an argument is a set of reasons presented in support of that claim. In other words, a claim is the main point being made, and an argument provides the rationale or evidence to persuade others of the validity of that claim.
Semantic ambiguity
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
Misplacing the burden of proof fallacy occurs when someone makes a claim but expects others to disprove it, rather than providing evidence to support their claim. This impacts the validity of an argument because the burden of proof should always be on the person making the claim. Without proper evidence, the argument lacks credibility and cannot be considered valid.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
the absence of relative words does not automatically immunize a claim from undesirable vagueness.
The main argument
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
Every argument should have a claim or thesis, evidence to support the claim, and reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim. Arguments are structured to persuade others of a particular viewpoint or position.