Nuclear weapons do not deter terrorists and indeed the use of nuclear weapons appeals to terrorists.
During the Cold War large superpowers acheived a stalemate since neither side wanted to start a nuclear conflict which could result in Mutual Assured destruction however terrorists have no such concerns.
nuclear warintimidationpropagandaetc.
the nuclear kind
Russian nuclear weapons have traditionally had higher yield than US nuclear weapons to compensate for the greater targeting error in their missiles.
volcano weapons are more powerful than nuclear volcanoes
If there are just enough nuclear weapons so yes they can destroy the World.
Mutually assured destruction, called for short (and sensibly so): the M.A.D. Principle.
truman doctrine
Announced US Policy, diected at the Soviet Union, that declared that the US could or would respond with the maximum number of nuclear weapons, if the United States (or key allies) was attacked with one or more nuclear weapons from the Soviet Union or any of its allies. It was designed to deter the Soviets from the use of nuclear weapons.
mutually assured destruction
MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction.
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
In nuclear weapons depots.
Zambia does not have nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons are weapons which are fueled by nuclear energy. Examples of weapons that can be fueled by nuclear energy are missile warheads and bombs.
Yes, they are nuclear weapons.
NO. Afghanistan does not have nuclear weapons, nor did it have nuclear weapons at any time, nor has it been accused by other countries of having nuclear weapons. Afghanistan is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for what that's worth.
Yea, it does.