answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The drive reduction and arousal approaches both try to explain motivation as an internal driving force to sustain some kind of an internal balance. The way they differ is in "what kind of an internal balance !!?". In drive reduction theory the internal balance is the homeostasis of primary biological needs (e.g. thirst, hunger, sex, sleep & bodytemperature). For exampleyour hypothalamus isresponsible for maintaining an optimal level ofGlucose in your blood, if you don't eat for half a day the Glucose level drops in your blood and this change in the balance will push yourhypothalamustotrigger anegative excitement that causes you to rush to aMacDonald.And if you eat too much, again thehypothalamuswill trigger a negative excitement to stop you from eating (hopefully) and maintain the balance.(----> Its biological)
In arousal approaches the internal balance is an optimal level of stimulation. When the level is too low, you feel bored and frustrated and seek something interesting to do (like playing a game on youriPadwhile the teacher is teaching). And when the level is too high, you mayexperiencehigh levels of stress and anxiety which pushes you to reduce the stimulation level. (like playing games on your iPad the night before exam).

(-----> Its Psychological)

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Arousal approaches focus on the idea that individuals are motivated to maintain an optimal level of physiological or psychological arousal, seeking out activities to increase or decrease arousal as needed. In contrast, drive reduction approaches propose that motivation arises from the desire to reduce internal tension or drives, such as hunger or thirst, through goal-directed behavior.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do arousal approaches to motivation differ from drive reduction approaches?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

Compare and contrast the forensic and cognitive approaches to interviewing?

The forensic approach to interviewing focuses on obtaining accurate and reliable information for legal purposes, emphasizing structured questioning and evidence-gathering techniques. In contrast, the cognitive approach to interviewing aims to understand memory processes and cognitive mechanisms that influence recall, focusing on enhancing memory retrieval through cognitive strategies and minimizing suggestibility. Both approaches prioritize obtaining accurate information, but they differ in their underlying frameworks and techniques used during the interview process.


What is Differential method of psychology?

The differential psychology approach focuses on understanding and measuring individual differences in behavior, personality, abilities, or other psychological traits. It aims to identify how and why people differ from one another in various aspects, such as intelligence, motivation, or emotional characteristics. This approach helps psychologists gain insights into the uniqueness and diversity of human behavior.


How sociological perspectives differ from psychological perspectives?

Sociological perspectives focus on understanding behavior by examining societal structures, institutions, and cultural norms, emphasizing the impact of social forces on individuals. Psychological perspectives focus on individual thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, exploring internal processes such as cognition, emotion, and motivation. While sociology considers broader social contexts, psychology emphasizes individual differences and mental processes.


Men and women are most likely to differ in their?

Men and women are most likely to differ in their physical characteristics, hormonal levels, and reproductive systems. Additionally, they may also differ in certain psychological and behavioral traits, but these differences can vary greatly among individuals and may not apply universally.


When people belong to different cohorts they differ in?

When people belong to different cohorts, they differ in terms of the time period in which they were born and the events and cultural influences that shaped their formative years. This can lead to differences in values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors across cohorts.

Related questions

Traditional and life-span approaches differ in regard to the importance of what in development?

childhood


What is Hans eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory?

Eysenck's inhibition and arousal theory proposes that individuals differ in their baseline level of arousal and their threshold for stimulation. According to this theory, introverts have higher baseline arousal levels and lower thresholds for stimulation, leading them to seek out quieter, less stimulating environments. In contrast, extroverts have lower baseline arousal levels and higher thresholds for stimulation, prompting them to seek out more stimulating environments.


Similar and difference between James-Lange Theory and Lazarus-Ishachler Theory of emotion?

These two theories differ more than they are similar to each other. The James-Lange theory argues that we experience the arousal from the event or situation first, and then we interpret the arousal and experience the emotion. Without the arousal there is no emotion experienced. The Lazarus theory argues that we must have a cognitive thought before any arousal or emotion is experienced. Without the thought there is no emotion experienced. These two theories are similar in the arousal that we experience before and during the emotion.


How does the labor supply approach differ from traditional forecasting approaches?

what is the differnce from traditional forecasting and labor supply chain


How did these woman differ in their approaches to achieving suffrage?

I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't know who " these women" are. We need names.


How do the definitions of oxidation and reduction differ?

Oxidation is the loss of electrons or an increase in oxidation state by a molecule, atom or ion. Reduction is the gain of electrons or a decrease in oxidation state by a molecule, atom, or ion.


How does Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory differ from the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory?

Lazarus's cognitive-mediation theory focuses on how cognitive appraisals of a situation mediate the emotional response. It suggests that when individuals appraise a situation as having personal relevance or as a threat, they experience emotional arousal. On the other hand, the Schachter-Singer cognitive arousal theory proposes that emotional experiences arise from the interpretation of physiological arousal, which is then given meaning through cognitive labeling. Thus, while Lazarus's theory emphasizes cognitive appraisals, the Schachter-Singer theory emphasizes the interpretation of physiological arousal.


What pair of half-reacations would have a negative total reduction potential?

A pair of half-reactions with reduction potentials that differ in sign will result in a negative total reduction potential. For example, a half-reaction with a reduction potential of +0.8 V paired with a half-reaction with a reduction potential of -0.7 V would give a negative total reduction potential (+0.8 V - (-0.7 V) = +1.5 V).


How did Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Dubois differ in their approaches to civil rights?

one licked nuts and one dident


How do DCF models differ?

All DCF approaches rely on a measure of cash flows to the suppliers of capital to the firm. They differ only in the choice of measurement, with the dividend approach measuring the cash flows directly and the others arriving at them in an indirect manner.


Is a female ejactulation thick?

Female ejaculation, also called squirting, can vary in consistency from thin to thick and can depend on factors such as hydration levels and arousal. The consistency can differ from person to person and is not necessarily always thick.


How do Farah and Elisa differ in their approach to dealing with Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

You may wish to resubmit the question using the individuals' full names so that their approaches can more easily be identified.