0
How did southern slaveholders claim the north benefited from slavery?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
They pointed out that the North's textile industry depended on southern cotton
Well, they didn't really. Northern states didn't really have slavery much at all. Though they did want more political and military power than the south, so they started the civil war. The civil war actually really wasn't just all about freeing the slaves. Actually, freeing the slaves may have been the last thing on their minds.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
What did Southern states claim would make them secede from the Union?
Southern states claimed that their right to own slaves was being threatened by the federal government, particularly with the election of Abraham Lincoln as president. They believed secession was necessary to preserve their economic and social system based on slavery.
What issue did the south claim states rights on?
Slavery. "State's Rights" is code language for "We want to own people of color".
What side had greater industrial capacity during the US Civil War?
The North, by far. Some claim that this was the biggest factor in Southern defeat.
How did slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did southerners claim that the North benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
Why did slaveholders claim the wilmot proviso was unconstitutional?
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
Why did southern democrats refused to nominate Stephen Douglas?
Like all things political, it's complicated.One obvious reason is that Douglas was not pro-slavery enough. While he was opposed to abolition, he refused to strongly endorse the Dred Scott decision and other pro-slavery judicial rulings or legislation.It has also been suggested that pro-slavery secessionists chose not to support Douglas knowing that this would lead to a split in the Democratic party and, effectively, throw the election to Lincoln. Douglas was not vehemently pro-slavery, but he clearly wasn't morally opposed to it. Douglas did claim not to own any slaves personally, but this was a technicality; his wife and children did, and his household benefited economically from them. Lincoln's anti-slavery sentiments are well testified to by both public addresses and private letters, and secessionists felt that a Lincoln administration would soon provide the impetus for the southern states to finally secede.
How and why did southern and northern white people differ over slavery?
Slavery was a divisive issue due primarily to ecconomic concerns of the era! Though the industrial revolution had began it was still in its infancy. the Southern states that allowed slavery had a distinct economic advantage over there northern neighbors that did not have an endless and relatively cost free work force. the Great Migration; African Americans study island cheaters states' rights
What did the Texans claim as their southern boundary?
Rio Grande river
Who has more National Championships in football Southern California or Alabama?
Alabama claims 12 National Titles while Southern California lays claim to 11.
Can credit card companies of deceased family member demand payment from spouse not on the account?
Yes, they can make a claim. The spouse is considered to have benefited from the debts.
The profitability of slavery in the south depended primarily upon what?
The profitability of slavery is still hotly debated. Most agree that it was profitable to some extent--but the rate of profitability varies depending on who you ask (i.e. some claim a 5% return in slave investments, while some claim a 10-12% return). These differences are significant because 5% returns may not have been enough to justify slave investments if 8% was available elsewhere. But, to answer the question, the profitability of slavery in the south probably depended quite a bit on the potential for future capital gains. Slave women bore many children (at the urging of slaveholders), and these children were sold--either when young or after they had been raised to adulthood. Since the slave trade had been shut down in the early 1800's, this was the only source of new slaves for southern landowners--thus those that owned slaves to start with had an advantage and could "produce more capital" (to use a highly insensitive method of describing childbirth for slave women). I hope that helps.
What did the Republic of Mexico claim as the southern border of Texas in 1846?
Rio Grande
What Southern US state lays claim to the Star Rose Quartz?
Georgia
