In general, people in the northern region of the United States were more opposed to slavery compared to those in the southern region. Many Northerners believed that slavery was morally wrong and incompatible with the principles of freedom and equality. This sentiment eventually played a significant role in fueling the abolitionist movement in the North.
White people believed slavery was good for various reasons, including economic gain, social status, and cultural beliefs about race superiority. The institution of slavery provided free labor for agriculture and industry, enabling economic success for slave owners. Additionally, prevalent racist ideologies at the time justified the subjugation of Black people as a means to maintain power and control.
Albert Barnes believed that more people were coming to think that slavery was wrong due to the spread of education and knowledge, which helped to enlighten people on the moral principles that should guide human behavior. This, in turn, led to a greater recognition of the inherent injustice and immorality of slavery.
Albert Barnes believed that more people were starting to think that slavery was wrong due to moral and philosophical considerations. He argued that as humanity progressed and developed a deeper understanding of human rights and dignity, the inherent immorality of slavery became increasingly apparent to more individuals.
Many people did not object to slavery for a long time due to economic benefits and societal norms that supported the institution. The shift towards abolition was influenced by moral and ethical considerations, as well as growing movements for equality and human rights. Additionally, the spread of Enlightenment ideas and the efforts of abolitionist activists played a crucial role in raising awareness and mobilizing support for the abolition of slavery.
Stephen A. Douglas believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed residents of a territory to decide whether or not to permit slavery. He believed this approach would help avoid conflicts over the issue of slavery in new territories.
You mean in the US? All of the Northern Sates of the USA were against slavery. The thought it was unlawful and unjust, which it was. :)
the northern and the south delegates have different ideas about slavery because the southern needed slaves and the northern did not
The Northern states abolished slavery. The Southern states had too much money invested in slaves already to go that far. Hope I helped! :)
Most of the Northern population believed that on moral and religious grounds, slavery was an evil institution. The Northern economy was not based on slavery, although the cotton from the South was produced by the labor of slaves.
Not all of the north thought slavery was bad and the people who were against slavery were in the north because the farms in the south needed them to tend fields and harvest cotton. Then if a slave escaped and became a northern citizen, they would obviously be against slavery.
They thought it was immoral and should be abolished.
Four of the "Northern" states permitted slavery. It was not common in the North, due to an absence of large farming operations. The South was mainly agriculture, North manufacturing- which did not use slaves that often.
in the south polethe polar region is located in the northern part of the world or earth i think
While most Northeners were not in favor of slavery, however, by abolishing it gave them cause for concern. They feared racial strife, Consitutional issues, fears that thousands of freed slaves would come streaming into Northern States, that freed slaves would be cheap labor for Northern industries and cause white unemployment and just plain racism.
I think their is 100,834,990 people in the Southern region!
Northern steppes
I think that most people at this time in history would agree that slavery was a bad thing, and therefore it was good that the institution of slavery was brought to an end by the victory of the northern states. However, the Civil Was was tremendously destructive, so it could be argued that the price paid for the ending of slavery was too high. In theory, there might have been non-violent means to resolve the issue. We will never really know.