I'm 99% sure that it's illegal to disclose the process for making nuclear bombs exactly. You're on your own.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ernest Rutherford did not make the nuclear bomb. He was a physicist who conducted pioneering work in the field of nuclear physics, particularly on the structure of the atom. The development of the nuclear bomb was primarily led by other scientists during the Manhattan Project in World War II.
To make a nuclear bomb, you need the fissionable material such as a Plutonium239 isotope, an explosive to start the nuclear chain reaction, a detonator, and a pusher.
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate
I could tell you but maybe the world's a better place with you not knowing.
A hydrogen bomb, also known as a thermonuclear bomb, relies on nuclear fusion to generate a much more powerful explosion than a traditional nuclear bomb, which uses nuclear fission. Hydrogen bombs are more destructive and have higher yields than nuclear bombs.
No, a nuclear power plant cannot turn into an atomic bomb. The fuel used in nuclear power plants is not weapons-grade, and the design and safety features of a nuclear reactor are different from those of a bomb. Additionally, the physics and engineering required to detonate a bomb are distinct from generating electricity in a power plant.