Carefully
Rhetorical questions. And what are questions, answers, and rhetorical-entries, without definitions of their key terms ?
There is nothing that you can do when you combine like terms that you cannot do without combining them. Some procedures might be easier, though, if like terms are combined.
Possible, but it's all hygeine, weight is irrelevant. For serious answers here, phrase your questions like an adult in non offensive terms
In very brief terms, and without going into minute detail, it describes the following questions: Who - What - When - Where - How.
To get a message across without alienating voters (Apex)
Multiple questions. See related questions.
which one of these terms might mean something big
In many cases questions can be vague, incorrectly spelt, have terms which are considered to be offensive, need corrected details to allow members to be able to respond in a reasonable time and in a manner that actually meets the criteria of the question. Where questions are seen to be offensive, use terms which can be considered bullying, insulting etc supervisors will change these or even remove the question. Very often the same question has already been asked in different words, so the new question is merged with it. You might have something like "What is the capital of Spain?" and "What is Spain's capital city?" which are the exact same question. It makes more sense to join them together under one set of words, instead of having lots of versions of the same question. As you can see, there are many reasons questions are changed. However, for whatever reason it is changed, while your question may be changed in its words, the meaning of it is not lost.
In terms pf multiple targets its a vampire but in terms of 1v1, defiantly a mage.
Depending on who says certain words can determine their offensive impact or labeling as bad. For instance terms like "azz" and "balls" could be considered offensive.
The terms for without oxygen are anaerobic or anoxic.
yes/no questions