Economic reason the farmers in the Constitution avoided the slavery question
Solon, the Athenian statesman and poet, introduced several reforms to help farmers facing economic distress. He implemented a debt relief policy that canceled existing debts and prohibited the practice of debt slavery, allowing farmers to regain their independence. Additionally, he restructured land ownership and promoted the cultivation of more profitable crops, which aimed to stabilize the agricultural economy and improve the livelihoods of farmers. These reforms helped to alleviate social tensions and foster a more equitable society in Athens.
Not all historians would agree that slavery was a "necessary" evil. In colonial America, slavery was a cheaper option was to running plantations than hiring laborers. Slaves weren't usually (if ever) paid for work, they often lived in broken-down buildings, their food was not high-quality.... etc. So I guess the shortest answer to this question would be: slavery was probably the cheapest and easiest way to run a plantation or farm.
Georgia farmers initially responded positively to Eli Whitney's and Phineas Miller's business plan for the cotton gin, as it promised to significantly increase cotton production by efficiently separating cotton fibers from seeds. This innovation allowed farmers to process cotton more quickly and profitably, leading to a boom in the cotton industry in the South. However, the increased demand for cotton also reinforced and expanded the reliance on enslaved labor, further entrenching the system of slavery in Georgia and other Southern states. Overall, the cotton gin transformed agricultural practices and the economy in Georgia, aligning farmers' interests with the expansion of plantation agriculture.
After slavery was abolished in the South, many plantations relied on sharecropping and tenant farming as a means of cheap labor. In these systems, former slaves and poor white farmers worked land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops, often leaving them in a cycle of debt and poverty. Additionally, many plantations employed labor from migrants and impoverished workers, further perpetuating exploitative labor practices. This transition maintained the agrarian economy's reliance on low-cost labor while circumventing the legal implications of slavery.
Cotton, Slavery, and Oil
Political parties avoided the issue of slavery for many years after the Missouri compromise.
slaves were farmers.
true
Because they were yeoman.
The Whig Party's platform completely avoided addressing the issue of slavery in the years leading up to the Civil War. They focused more on economic issues and internal improvements rather than taking a stance on the divisive issue of slavery.
Slavery has had a great impact on the United States. Originally slavery was used as free labor for many farmers.
What were the economic reason the framers avoided the slvaery question
Western Farmers where not really against of for slavery, but they did not want slaves to be set free for fear of them taking there land and vausing them more trouble than they already have with the indians.
because they need them to help with there crops
The Whigs and Democrats avoided and evaded the issue of slavery in the election of 1848 by splitting down the middle on who was for and who was against slavery. Whigs and Democrats in the South wanted to keep slavery. Whigs and Democrats in the North wanted to abolish slavery.
Because farmers needed slaves to pick cotton, Dumb a$$, did you mean Framers?
The issue that the North and South fought over was called the Wilmot Proviso. It was basically a law of slavery: the North and South were fighting over slavery. The North were anti-slavery and the South were pro-slavery