answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It does in a certain regards .if a state ,lets say Iran, develops nuclear weapons it effectivly acts as a deterent against aggression from ..well the primary global aggressor ,united states .compromising their abillity to continue an oppressive global dominance agenda.that is why washington is in such fanatical opposition towards irans nuculear energy program.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does the Threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

Who are the winners of nobel peace prise?

The first Nobel Peace Prize was first given out in 1901. Since then 127 people or organizations have been given the award. The two most recent were the European Union in 2012 and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in 2013. The winner for 2014 is scheduled to be announced in October.


Who won the 1963 nobel peace prize for phiysics?

Nobody did. There is no Nobel Peace Prize for Physics. The Nobel Peace Prize is givenfor advancing the cause of peace, whereas the Nobel Prize for Physics is given foraccomplishments in Physics.In 1963, the Nobel Prize in Physics was split 3 ways:Eugene B. Wigner of the USA, for contributions totheoretical Atomic and Nuclear PhysicsMaria Goeppert-Mayer of the USA, and J.H.D. Jensen of Germany,for Shell model theory and magic numbers for the atomic nucleus


Who won the 1998 Nobel Peace Prize for physics?

== == == == == == == == There is no "Nobel PEACE prize for PHYSICS.There's a prize for Peace, and a prize for Physics.The Peace prize in 1998 was won by John Hume and David Trimble of Northern Ireland for the role they played in the Northern Irish Peace Process, and the Good Friday Agreement.The Prize for Physics in 1998 was won by Robert B. Laughlin; Horst L. Störmer; and Daniel C. Tsui.I think it is the achivement of peace? I think it is the achivement of peace?


People who won Nobel Peace Prize?

The first Nobel Peace Prize was awarded jointly to Henry Dunant and Frederic Passy in 1901. In 1964, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Martin Luther King, Jr. Mother Teresa won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979.


How Has Nuclear Power Influenced Society?

That's a very broad question that sounds like an essay question from Junior High. Nuclear power has offered society the potential to produce essentially unlimited amounts of electricity using a technology that few of the users understand. When the majority of people hear "nuclear power" they immediately think of nuclear weapons, Hiroshima, Chernobyl, TMI, and general holocaust. They do not think "hot water, steam generator, spinning turbine, and radioactive decay" and they do not recognize that every technological advance has advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of nuclear power to generate electricity compared to coal, is that there is significantly less disturbance to the earth in the mining of the fuel, there are no products of combustion released to the atmosphere, the volume of the waste produced is orders of magnitude less and completely controlled, and the radioactivity of the spent fuel will eventually decay to harmless levels. Further, the spent fuel can be reprocessed to recover the useable material and reuse it in new fuel. The disadvantages of the present generation of nuclear power plants is the complexity of the design which leads to over engineering of the systems and components. More components in the design means that there are more components to fail. The redundancy of separate trains of safety systems assures tht the fuel remains cooled however the numbers of failures fosters the image that the design isn't safe. The media that discusses nuclear power tends to speak in absolutist terms such as "could there be a reactor fuel melt down?" The answer is "yes" with a probability that can be calculated based on the probability of failure of different pieces of equipment. That failure probability tends to be in the 10E-6 range or less, meaning that the string of failures needed to arrive at a fuel melt will happen once every 10E6 years (that's 1,000,000 years). This is not an easy concept to grasp, so the path of least resistance for the media is to not explain it. It's easier to ask an open-ended question and cut to commercial. It could be argued that nuclear power really hasn't influenced society much at all in that most of the population doesn't know or care where their electricy comes from so long as the lights come on when the switch is thrown. People who live far from a nuclear plant can afford to oppose the technology since they don't have to think about it beyond the abstract. Those people who live close to a plant frequently learn to appreciate it for the good jobs that the site provides and the clean and generally reliable electricity it delivers. There are a few pro-nuclear web sites which can provide that point of view. Nuclear Is Our Future (NIOF) has links to other sites which can provide additional information. Pay particular attention to John Cameron and his theories on radiation exposure.

Related questions

Why were there no nuclear weapons in the cold war?

The "cold" in "Cold War" means the two sides weren't shooting at each other. There were nuclear weapons, but just the threat of annihilation was enough to keep an uneasy peace.


What can the United Nations do to solve the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation?

If the majority of the members of the United Nations or the majority of nations that sit on the UN's Security Council believe that another nation acquiring nuclear weapons is a serious threat to world peace, economic sanctions can be set against such a nation. The UN can also send in inspectors to determine if a nation is becoming a threat to world peace because of it building a nuclear weapons system. If all the members of the UN's Security Council vote to sanction trade or funds of a threatening nation, that sends a powerful message to the offending nation.


What two aggressive act did President Nixon engage in to force the North Vietnamese to the Paris Peace talks?

Bombing of Hanoi is one, not sure about the other... The threat of nuclear weapons, perhaps?


Why should you stop making nuclear weapons?

Because the nuclear weapons will not bring peace they will just bring more and more war and that will definitely not solve any problems.


Are nuclear weapons threat to world peace?

Yes, nuclear weapons are widely regarded as a significant threat to the world for several reasons: **Destructive Power:** Nuclear weapons are extraordinarily destructive. A single nuclear explosion can cause immense immediate damage, including extensive loss of life and infrastructure. The long-term effects, such as radiation, can have severe health and environmental consequences. **Humanitarian Impact:** The use of nuclear weapons can result in catastrophic human suffering, both directly through immediate casualties and indirectly through long-term health effects, displacement, and disruption of essential services. **Environmental Impact:** Nuclear explosions can have long-lasting environmental consequences, including radioactive fallout, which can affect ecosystems and contaminate water and soil. **Proliferation and Terrorism:** The spread of nuclear weapons and materials to non-state actors or unstable regions poses a risk of nuclear terrorism, making it a global security concern. **Conflict Escalation:** In international conflicts, the presence of nuclear weapons can potentially escalate conflicts to the point of mass destruction. The concept of mutual assured destruction (MAD) has been a deterrent but also a source of concern. **Accidental Use:** The existence of nuclear weapons creates the possibility of accidental or unintended use due to technical malfunctions, miscommunication, or human error. **Arms Race:** The pursuit of nuclear weapons by multiple nations can lead to arms races, increasing the global stockpile and the risk of use. Efforts to address these threats have been made through international treaties and agreements. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote disarmament. However, the complete elimination of nuclear weapons remains a complex challenge. Many governments, international organizations, and civil society groups continue to advocate for disarmament and arms control to mitigate the threat of nuclear weapons and work towards a world without them. The perception of nuclear weapons as a global threat has been a driving force behind these efforts.


What were the major postwar peace initiatives?

Pledge of soviet union not to use nuclear weapons as the first (1982).


What Japanese city is the site of the peace memorial park and the eternal peace flame which is never to be extinguish until all nuclear weapons are dismantled?

Nagasaki


What effects did the atomic bomb have at the time and in the long run?

the threat of atomic weapons made japan want to talk peace


What has the author N Ranganathan written?

N. Ranganathan has written: 'Sri Thirumazhisai Piran's Naanmukan Thiruvandhadhi' 'Nuclear holocaust, or, World peace' -- subject(s): Nuclear disarmament, Nuclear warfare, Nuclear weapons


How do weapons of mass destruction prevent war?

Nuclear weapons serve as a deterrent. One country will be less likely to attack another that it knows has nuclear capability because of the destruction that could be wrought by nuclear weapons. This theory is called MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction, meaning that both sides would destroy each other so utterly by going to war that peace (even bitter cold peace) is the only viable option. Biological and Chemical weapons, which are also called weapons of mass destruction, do not have this deterrent effect.


Why was cold war such a threat to a world peace?

The two biggest powers in the world did not trust each other and looked at their interests in Europe in particular and their build up of nuclear weapons as major issues. The Soviet Union had extended its influence into eastern Europe, setting up a communist bloc. This was seen as a threat. They both had nuclear weapons. They were both increasing their stocks and doing other things to build their power, like in the space race. There were some serious issues, like in the Cuban Missile Crisis, which nearly caused conflict.


What has the author JOSEPH ROTBLAT written?

JOSEPH ROTBLAT has written: 'QUEST FOR GLOBAL PEACE: ROTBLAT AND IKEDA ON WAR, ETHICS, AND THE NUCLEAR THREAT'