sadly, yes. it was thought that it was better to get as much work out of the slave before it died. there was no need seen to treat a sick slave when one could be bought or a child would soon be ready to work
Yes. Because back then slaves werent treated like human beings.
No, not at all. Slaves were expected to work whether they were healthy or sick.
pretending to be sick to avoid work
Pretending to be sick to avoid work is an example of passive resistance used by slaves.
The slave masters wanted the people (slaves) to work work and work if they even take a short break the slaves get beat up. If the slaves are sick or worthless they KILL them. And the slave masters were mean when I say mean I mean it. The slave master tie the slaves be neck and leave them bleeding.
Pretending to be sick to avoid work.
The slaves would sometimes pretend to be sick, so they can get out of work for 1-3 days.
If the slaves were sick, they would usually be thrown offboard and left to swim. This is because no-one would want to buy the sick slaves.
There are still slaves today.
It is a compound sentence.
Slaves owners could use brutal force by beating their slaves into submission or they would simply be kind to their slaves while still enforcing a good work ethic.
from when the slaves rebelled and got tired of your work you all fat sick me dont know me dummy you arr vas legas