Three conflicting views on slavery in the west were some people wanted it banned, some thought it was wrong, and finally some thought it should be aloud in their territories.
the views were very bad and harsh
During the Civil War, the Western states and territories had diverse views on slavery. While some areas, particularly those in the Midwest, were largely anti-slavery and supported the Union, others, especially in the border states, maintained pro-slavery sentiments. The question of slavery in the West was complicated by issues of statehood and the expansion of slavery into new territories, leading to significant political and social tensions. Overall, the West was not uniformly for or against slavery but had a mix of perspectives reflecting the broader national conflict.
John C. Calhoun was a strong proponent of slavery and believed that it should be allowed to expand into the western territories. He argued that slavery was a positive good, essential for the economic and social order of the South. Calhoun contended that denying the extension of slavery into the West would violate the rights of Southern states and their citizens, ultimately advocating for the protection of slaveholding interests as essential to the Union's stability. His views significantly influenced the political debates leading up to the Civil War.
Well the main concern of many republicans in the Union during the time was to keep the West free as the nation expanded westward. The South (as well as many Northerners) were in support of popular sovereignty, which took place in the states of Kansas and Nebraska. Men from both the North and South literally packed up there belongings and traveled across the country to keep those states free/slavery-advocating. Along with this, you can consider the Alamo, in which American-Texans rebelled against the Mexican government. Much of this was due to the fact that the Mexican government forbidden slavery, which upset the southern Americans residing in northern Mexico (now Texas). In short, the West was far less concrete as far as views on slavery-advocacy goes. Generally, it was either abolitionist or slavery-supporter. Some people (generally Northernors) supported the idea of deporting the slaves and sending them to their native Africa, however this idea didn't last long.
A Database has three views. The External Schema: What the end user sees. The Internal Schema: What the programmers of the program see. The Conceptual Schema: The basic plan of the database. Most of the time this is in paper form as a Conceptual Schema Diagram (CSD)
1) very bad and harsh 2)slave were mistreated 3)
Robert Yates was a prominent anti-federalist during the founding era, and his views on slavery were largely ambiguous. While he did not openly advocate for abolition, he did express concerns about the institution of slavery conflicting with the principles of liberty and equality. His stance on slavery was influenced by his commitment to states' rights and his opposition to centralized government control.
The conflicting perspective
There are three views of conflict: 1- The traditional view The human relations view The interactionist view
Abraham Lincoln was raised by his father who was a strict Baptist and did not believe in slavery. His views and the encounters Lincoln had with slaves themselves influenced his views on slavery.
the north's views on slavery were ngative and they wanted it abolished. that is why slaves went to the north when they ran away.
William Wilberforce had very strong views, in favor of abolishing slavery.
In the 19th century, two conflicting positions that contributed to the American Civil War were the North's opposition to the expansion of slavery and the South's insistence on maintaining and expanding the institution of slavery for economic and social reasons. The North favored a more industrialized economy and sought to limit slavery's reach into new territories, while the South relied heavily on agriculture and saw slavery as essential to its economic system. These contrasting views on slavery and states' rights created deep divisions that ultimately led to secession and war.
the views were very bad and harsh
Hugh Williamson was a founding father of the United States and a signer of the U.S. Constitution. He held conflicting views on slavery, initially supporting gradual emancipation but later becoming more accepting of the institution. Williamson ultimately believed that the economic impact of abolishing slavery would be too disruptive for society.
An abolitionist was an individual who held strong antislavery views.
Because of the north