Yes, uranium-233 produced in a reactor from thorium, has almost identical fissile properties to plutonium-239.
Nuclear transmutation for uranium-233 (U-233) typically occurs when it absorbs a neutron and undergoes beta decay. In this process, U-233 can convert into thorium-233 (Th-233), which then decays into protactinium-233 (Pa-233) and eventually into stable uranium-233. This transformation is significant in nuclear reactions, especially in the context of breeding fuel in nuclear reactors.
Fission bombs. They use one or more of 3 fuels: Uranium-233, Uranium-235, or Plutonium-239.
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
Zambia does not have nuclear weapons.
In nuclear weapons depots.
Nuclear weapons are weapons which are fueled by nuclear energy. Examples of weapons that can be fueled by nuclear energy are missile warheads and bombs.
Yes, they are nuclear weapons.
NO. Afghanistan does not have nuclear weapons, nor did it have nuclear weapons at any time, nor has it been accused by other countries of having nuclear weapons. Afghanistan is also a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, for what that's worth.
Uranium-233 is not bad ! It is an important nuclear fuel . And also can be used in nuclear weapons.But it is radioactive and toxic as all uranium isotopes.
Pakistan has about 100 nuclear weapons.
No, Nazi Germany had no nuclear weapons.
nuclear deterrence - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will attack you back with nuclear weaponsmutual assured destruction - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will totally destroy you with nuclear weapons and if I attack you with nuclear weapons then you will totally destroy me with nuclear weapons - thus any nuclear attack by either party will result in the certain destruction of both parties