0
What else can I help you with?
Are gun manufacturers or gundealers ever morally responsible for feath caused by gun?
Not if it was a legal sale.
Are gun makers morally responsible for the death caused by the use of those guns?
No more than the maker of a car being morally responsible for deaths caused by drunk drivers.
IS THE DRIVER OR OWNER responsible for an impounded car?
Legally it is the owner. Morally it would be whoever caused it to be impounded in the first place.
Are gun makers morally responsible of deaths caused by the use of their guns?
No, A gun does not act on its own- it requires a human being.
What high tech products did vacuum manufacturers introduce in the late 90s?
vacuum manufacturers wanted consumers to be alerted to the damage caused by fine dusts. Eureka, for example, introduced a line of environmentally friendly vacuums that were designed to filter out 99 percent of the dust and dirt that entered the vacuum
What are faulty products called?
Faulty products are commonly referred to as "defective goods" or "defective products." These items fail to meet quality standards or do not perform as intended, posing safety risks or not functioning properly. In legal terms, they may also be classified as "unfit for purpose" or "nonconforming goods." Manufacturers can be held liable for damages caused by such products.
Should gun manufacturers be held responsible in deaths that are caused by their products?
No, unless the gun is faulty and goes off by itself causing a death. Generally guns do not kill people, people kill people with guns. If they had no guns they would use other weapons, or even their bare hands. People kill others with cars; sometimes the car is used as a weapon to run someone down. Is that the responsibilith of the car manufacturer or is it the responsibility of the murderous idiot behind the wheel?
What are some examples of cases where strict product liability has been applied?
Strict product liability has been applied in cases involving defective products such as faulty car brakes, contaminated food products, and unsafe pharmaceutical drugs. In these instances, manufacturers and sellers can be held liable for any harm caused by their products, regardless of fault or negligence.
Should companies be responsible for unemployment caused by the information systems Why or why not?
Yes they should be responsible.
What responsibility do manufacturers have in the design and use of harmful products?
Manufacturers have a critical responsibility to ensure that their products are designed with safety in mind and to minimize potential harm to consumers and the environment. This includes conducting thorough risk assessments, using safe materials, and adhering to regulatory standards. Additionally, they should provide clear instructions and warnings for safe use, and take accountability for any adverse effects caused by their products. Ultimately, ethical manufacturing practices should prioritize public health and safety over profit.
Should companies be responsible for unemployment caused by their information systems?
Yes they should be responsible.
Who should be responsible for my friend's injury?
Whoever caused the injury should be held liable for it. If your friend did something reckless, which caused the injury, then your friend is solely responsible.
