0
What else can I help you with?
Why are there usually few organisms at the energy pyramid?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
Why are there so few organisms at the top of an energy pyramid?
This is because only about 10% of energy is transferred from one trophic level to the next. The other 90% or so is used up by the organism itself for life processes, digestion, excretion, growth, movement and transpiration for plants. Therefore the amount of energy decrease up the trophic levels and the higher the trophic level, the less the energy received.
How does the 10 percent rule relate to the biomass pyramid?
As the levels progress upward in a pyramid form, only 10% of the energy level below can be transfered as energy to the next level. Using the lowest level as having 100%, the next level only has 10% of that 100% to use for energy. The third level will have 10% of 10% of that 100% to use for energy. Because there is only so much at each level to use, the number of animals and plants become smaller. At most there will be 3 levels. A very few will reach 4 levels.
What does a biomas pyramid represent?
I think you might be talking about a biomass pyramid. I never heard of a biotic pyramid. Take a look at this website. It might help you. http://earth.rice.edu/MTPE/bio/biosphere/topics/energy/40_biomass.html
How does the pyramid shape illustrate the fate of energy along a food chain?
An energy pyramid is like a food chain, because at the top of the pyramid, there is the most energy, and at the bottom there is the least energy. The same goes for a food chain, because the producer has 100% of the energy. The final consumer, or tursury consumer, has either little or no energy left from the primary, and secondary consumers, because they have used up almost all the energy breathing, moving and during digestion.
Why are there usually few organisms at the energy pyramid?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
Why are there so few organisms at the top of an energy pyramid?
This is because only about 10% of energy is transferred from one trophic level to the next. The other 90% or so is used up by the organism itself for life processes, digestion, excretion, growth, movement and transpiration for plants. Therefore the amount of energy decrease up the trophic levels and the higher the trophic level, the less the energy received.
What is a enery pyramid?
If the organisms in a food chain are arranged according to trophic levels, they form a pyramid, with a broad base representing the primary producers and usually only a few individuals in the highest part of the pyramid. Also known as a "pyramid of numbers," an ecological pyramid is a way of describing the distribution of energy, biomass, or individuals among the different levels of ecosystem structure.
What is flow the energy to a third -level consumer if the producer provides 1500 calories of energy to the first-level consumer?
Only about 10% is passed from level to level. In this case it is 10% of 1500 calories or 150 calories. This the reason why there has to be many, many producers and why there are only a few consumers. And why you will only see a few eagles or wolves at the very top of the pyramid.
How does the 10 percent rule relate to the biomass pyramid?
As the levels progress upward in a pyramid form, only 10% of the energy level below can be transfered as energy to the next level. Using the lowest level as having 100%, the next level only has 10% of that 100% to use for energy. The third level will have 10% of 10% of that 100% to use for energy. Because there is only so much at each level to use, the number of animals and plants become smaller. At most there will be 3 levels. A very few will reach 4 levels.
Why are there few organisms at the top of an energy pyramid?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
Why are the usually few organisms at the top of an energy pyramid?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
Do animals live in the tundra?
yes but only a few kinds
Which zone has only a few plants and animals living there?
timbuktu
Why are there only a few 'chains' in a food chain?
because there is not that many animals that eat other animals.
Why are there only a few chains in a food chains?
because there is not that many animals that eat other animals.
Why are there few organisms at the top of the pyramid?
In a stable ecoystem, there should always be more producers than carnivores. For one, there has to be more energy, because your energy flow has to reach the top of the pyramid through your primary, secondary, etc. consumers. There has to be more at the bottom because the organisms at the upper levels have to have a food source. How would the jungle look if there were 100 tigers and only 1 plant?
