Using his telescope, Galileo observed Jupiter over a period of months. He easily noticed the 4 largest moons. Which you can remember using this simple pneumonic device.
I. E.at G.reen C.atterpillars
Io, Europoa, Ganeimyde, and Callisto
Anyway, he observed these over a period of month, and sketched their movements every week or so, and eventually began to notice that they would disappear for a day or two, and then reappear on the other side of Jupiter. Logically they must have been orbiting around Jupiter.
This contradicted the Ptolemic model in which all objects in space orbited around the earth.
Yes, scientific hypotheses should be testable and falsifiable, meaning they can be supported or refuted through experimentation and evidence. Observations should also be repeatable by other researchers to ensure the reliability of the results and conclusions drawn from the scientific study.
The results in the scientific method are based on observations and experiments that are conducted to test a hypothesis. Scientists collect and analyze data to draw conclusions about the relationship between variables and to determine if the hypothesis is supported or refuted. These results are then used to either confirm or refine existing scientific knowledge.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon or a prediction about the relationship between variables, based on observations and existing knowledge. It is a testable statement that guides scientific research and can be supported or refuted through experimentation.
Louis Pasteur is credited with refuting the concept of spontaneous generation with his experiments in the mid-19th century. He showed that living organisms do not arise from non-living matter but instead come from pre-existing life forms, laying the foundation for the field of microbiology.
A hypothesis must be testable, meaning it must be capable of being supported or refuted through observation or experiment. It should also be specific and clear, outlining the relationship between variables. Additionally, a hypothesis needs to be falsifiable, meaning there must be a way to prove it wrong.
A testable explanation that is supported or refuted is called a hypothesis.
that cannot be refuted or disproved: irrefutable logic.
A hypothesis is typically formulated at the beginning of a research study or experiment, based on observations and existing knowledge about a topic. It serves as a testable explanation or prediction that guides the research process. It is then tested through experimentation and analysis to determine if it is supported or refuted.
Yes, scientific hypotheses should be testable and falsifiable, meaning they can be supported or refuted through experimentation and evidence. Observations should also be repeatable by other researchers to ensure the reliability of the results and conclusions drawn from the scientific study.
The results in the scientific method are based on observations and experiments that are conducted to test a hypothesis. Scientists collect and analyze data to draw conclusions about the relationship between variables and to determine if the hypothesis is supported or refuted. These results are then used to either confirm or refine existing scientific knowledge.
express an idea that can be refuted or defended
the master refuted the padowan. Use another sentence.
He strongly rejected or disagreed with the statement.
maria refuted the president's argument as she yelled and gesticulated at the t.v.
Creationists use deceit to advance their often refuted ideological positions.
This is the theory of Lamarck and it is long refuted.
Two main concepts. The concept of acquired characteristics where a characteristic, such as developed muscles, could be passed on to progeny. Refuted. Also the concept that organisms have a innate " desire " to evolve in certain directions. Also refuted.