Telescopes like the Hubble
idk im the best
It's largely a matter of features and construction. Basically, the Zhumell uses a "camera tripod", which uses a "joystick" for aiming the scope. It's very "handy", but... it tends to "shift" the aim, a bit, when you "lock it down". It works ok, but... there are no "granular" adjustments, in any axis, so "tracking" a moving "object" (eg. the stars, etc) can be challenging. By comparison, the Celestron uses separate declination (eg. up/down) and azumith (left/right) controls, and the declination does have a "granular" adjustment. So, as with the "joystick", it works ok, but, again, "tracking" a moving "object" (eg. the stars, etc) can be challenging. An "equatorial mount" allows "granular" adjustments in both axises. It's a bit more expensive, and it's quite "precise", but... it's a bit of a "pain" to get it all set up and adjusted. I've had both; I still have the Zhumell Zenith.
It doesn't have to be big telescopes, there does not even have to be a telescope. It is called an observatory because it is a place where astronomical observations are made. Long before the first telescope was made there were observatories.
Reflecting telescopes use mirrors to collect and focus light, while refracting telescopes use lenses. Reflecting telescopes typically have a closed tube design which protects the mirrors from dust and other contaminants, while refracting telescopes are more prone to chromatic aberration. Reflecting telescopes are generally easier to manufacture at larger sizes compared to refracting telescopes.
The average price of Zhumell Binoculars is _Ç£98. One can purchase these from the following retailers: Zhumell, Amazon, eBay, Best Buy, Optics Planet, to name a few.
to see uranus
Yes, the earliest telescopes made things look thousand of times closer than they were, and modern telescopes still do that.
Telescopes like the Hubble
WAS IT ERIKSON'S DISCOVERIES MADE OR BENEFITS OF THE WORLD?
Telescopes made no contribution whatsoever to any society in the Middle Ages,mainly because there were no telescopes during the Middle Ages.
Optical telescopes are placed high to avoid having to look through the thickest part of the atmosphere. Radio telescopes are place in valleys to avoid the effects of man-made electrical noise in the telescope.
Researchers use all of these: -- optical telescopes -- radio telescopes -- x-ray telescopes -- infra-red telescopes -- ultraviolet telescopes
becasue scientist made a discovery of FMR
idk im the best
It's largely a matter of features and construction. Basically, the Zhumell uses a "camera tripod", which uses a "joystick" for aiming the scope. It's very "handy", but... it tends to "shift" the aim, a bit, when you "lock it down". It works ok, but... there are no "granular" adjustments, in any axis, so "tracking" a moving "object" (eg. the stars, etc) can be challenging. By comparison, the Celestron uses separate declination (eg. up/down) and azumith (left/right) controls, and the declination does have a "granular" adjustment. So, as with the "joystick", it works ok, but, again, "tracking" a moving "object" (eg. the stars, etc) can be challenging. An "equatorial mount" allows "granular" adjustments in both axises. It's a bit more expensive, and it's quite "precise", but... it's a bit of a "pain" to get it all set up and adjusted. I've had both; I still have the Zhumell Zenith.
It doesn't have to be big telescopes, there does not even have to be a telescope. It is called an observatory because it is a place where astronomical observations are made. Long before the first telescope was made there were observatories.