The Big Bang is a theory that discusses the origin of the universe (from a single point source of incredible density and energy) while the Nebular Hypothesis is a theory that discusses the origins of stars and their planetary systems (through the accretion of interstellar gas).
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.
nebular theory
The Nebular Hypothesis is the consensus model for explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System. Solar Systems, like so much other accumulated matter, are just a byproduct of the creation event. The only correlation I can draw between the Nebular Hypothesis and the Big Bang Theory is that they are both concensus models for their respective concerns, and they both provide for an explanation of a beginning for their respective considerations. Perhaps a statement can be made that solar systems provided for the genesis of organic life and the Big Bang provided for the genesis of existence of matter from which organic life was promulgated.
The three theories of the formation of the solar system are the nebular theory, the planetesimal hypothesis, and the gravitational instability theory. The nebular theory proposes that the solar system formed from a rotating disk of dust and gas, while the planetesimal hypothesis suggests that small, solid bodies collided and accreted to form planets. The gravitational instability theory proposes that clumps of material in a protoplanetary disk collapsed under their gravity to form planets.
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for existence within the universe, the actual formation (or creation) of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
They both exploded
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.
nebular theory
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for (or made) existence within the universe, the actual formation of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
The Nebular Hypothesis is the consensus model for explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System. Solar Systems, like so much other accumulated matter, are just a byproduct of the creation event. The only correlation I can draw between the Nebular Hypothesis and the Big Bang Theory is that they are both concensus models for their respective concerns, and they both provide for an explanation of a beginning for their respective considerations. Perhaps a statement can be made that solar systems provided for the genesis of organic life and the Big Bang provided for the genesis of existence of matter from which organic life was promulgated.
The use of the term 'world' is a little ambiguous. However considering the world as representative of Earth, then I would provide an answer with this in mind. Considering the Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum, then without this environment there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for (or made) existence within the universe, the actual formation of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
The theory you are referring to is known as the "interstellar cloud theory" or the "capture theory." This theory suggests that a passing star disrupted a nearby interstellar cloud of gas and dust, causing material to be pulled into the forming Sun, leading to the birth of our solar system.
hi i am minaskshi and the answer is that the big bang theory is put forth in the year between 1925 -1929
i search nyo
The three theories of the formation of the solar system are the nebular theory, the planetesimal hypothesis, and the gravitational instability theory. The nebular theory proposes that the solar system formed from a rotating disk of dust and gas, while the planetesimal hypothesis suggests that small, solid bodies collided and accreted to form planets. The gravitational instability theory proposes that clumps of material in a protoplanetary disk collapsed under their gravity to form planets.
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for existence within the universe, the actual formation (or creation) of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.