answersLogoWhite

0

The same type of evidence that supports the idea that our Earth goes around our Sun -- if our solar system is geocentric, we'd observe one thing; if heliocentric, we'd observe something different. Since what we DO observe is what we WOULD observe if our Earth goes around our Sun, then we conclude it DOES -- even if 25% of Americans do not believe that to be the case.

The evidence that the space within our Universe was almost infinitely dense about 13.7 billion years ago, and has been expanding at a (pretty much) steady rate ever since, is overwhelmingly persuasive.

Amongst the evidence in favor:

1) The distance between us and all distant galaxies is increasing, and the rate at which the distance is increasing is directly proportional to the distance between us and these galaxies.

2) There exists an isotropic (to one part in 10,000) and continuous radiation, with a spectrum of a blackbody at 2.7K. This is exactly as predicted by BBC, and allows to see light from our early Universe -- less than 400,000 years after the Big Bang.

3) The ratio of hydrogen to helium in all parts of our Universe are exactly as predicted by BBC.

4) The ratio of long-lived isotopes to their decay products shows decays began about 10 billion years ago.

5) Quasars are seen far from us, but not close to us.

6) The absence of white dwarf stars older than about ten billion years.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What do scientists believe provides evidence for the bid bang theory?

Scientists believe that several key pieces of evidence support the Big Bang theory, including the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of light elements like hydrogen and helium. The redshift of distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, while the cosmic microwave background radiation is thought to be the afterglow of the initial explosion. Additionally, the proportions of light elements align with predictions made by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Together, these observations provide strong support for the theory.


How many people believe in the big bang theory?

The Big Bang theory is accepted by the majority of the scientific community and is supported by evidence like the cosmic microwave background radiation. It is estimated that a significant majority of scientists and researchers in relevant fields accept the theory as the most plausible explanation for the origins of the universe. It is difficult to provide an exact number of people who believe in the Big Bang theory outside of the scientific community.


What scientist believe provides evidence of the big bang theory?

Scientists do not sit in the coffeeshop and dream up a theory and thengo looking for evidence to support it. Scientists make observations andmeasurements of what IS ... the "evidence" you might say ... and then tryto put together a theory to explain what they see.The "Big Bang" theory is the best explanation so far for the observation that allgalaxies in every direction are receding from us at speeds that are proportionalto their distance from us, and for the observation that all of space is filled withan almost uniform level of electromagnetic radiation with a distribution of wavelengthsthat is characteristic of a blackbody at the temperature of 2.7 K, and for theobservation that on the largest scale, the universe consists of roughly 75%hydrogen and 24% helium.


Astronomers use various tools to gather evidence in support of the Big Bang Theory What are two tools used?

Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.


Although Dalton's atomic theory was rejected at first he used his theory to do what that soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists?

Instead of just stating his own personal opinions John Dalton cited evidence to support his atomic theory. The giving of evidence - which could be proved or disproved by others - was what soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists.

Related Questions

Did 'man' start from apes?

Some people believe in that theory, but some people believe in Adam and Eve. Scientists claim that they have found evidence that we started from apes.


Why do most scientists believe that all life on earth evolved from a single-called ancestor?

Scientists believe in the theory of universal common ancestry because of evidence like the genetic code shared by all living organisms, similarities in biochemical processes, and the fossil record showing the progression of life forms over time. This theory provides a coherent explanation for the diversity and unity of life on Earth.


What is the theory that all the scientists provided evidence for the cell theory?

For their own benefits.


Why did many scientists not accept the early theiories of continental drifts?

Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.


What do scientists believe provides evidence for the bid bang theory?

Scientists believe that several key pieces of evidence support the Big Bang theory, including the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of light elements like hydrogen and helium. The redshift of distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, while the cosmic microwave background radiation is thought to be the afterglow of the initial explosion. Additionally, the proportions of light elements align with predictions made by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Together, these observations provide strong support for the theory.


Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?

They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.


What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?

Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.


How many people believe in the big bang theory?

The Big Bang theory is accepted by the majority of the scientific community and is supported by evidence like the cosmic microwave background radiation. It is estimated that a significant majority of scientists and researchers in relevant fields accept the theory as the most plausible explanation for the origins of the universe. It is difficult to provide an exact number of people who believe in the Big Bang theory outside of the scientific community.


What continent scientists believe early modern humans came from?

Scientists believe early modern humans originated in Africa. This theory is supported by fossil and genetic evidence that suggests humans evolved in Africa before migrating to other continents.


Why do scientists believe that the universe began with an explosion?

Scientists believe in the Big Bang theory because it is supported by evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed expansion of the universe. These observations suggest that the universe was once in a hot, dense state and has been expanding since its beginning.


Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?

me and your mom


When would scientists need to change a theory?

Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.