This is not a question that can be answered with a simple 'yes' or 'no'. Embryonic stem cell research has the potential to cure a range of degenerative disorders from Alzheimer's to ALS, as well as supply organ transplants without the risk of immune rejection. To harvest functional stem cells, they must be extracted from a fertilized egg before the cells differentiate, or 12-14 days maximum. Fertilized eggs from in vitro fertilization clinics have been used only after fertilization attempts have ended. These fertilized eggs are notguaranteed to implant or be able to develop into a baby, and neither of these if a prerequisite for harvesting ES cells. Only 24% of attempted IVF pregnancies yielded a live and healthy baby in 2005 (mdwebsite.com). On the one hand, these fertilized eggs will never be used for anything yet hold such a promising therapy for so many individuals alive today. The ethical parallel for this situation is, "is it ethically wrong to use functional organs as transplants from a deceased individual, or wouldn't it be a waste?" On the other hand, we realize that society has created these fertilized eggs, and a small percentage of them have the potential to develop into healthy babies if given to correct situation. ES harvesting as of yet, does not differentiate between these two, and must destroy the embryo in order to retrieve the ES cells. This is destroying the potentialfor life in certain embryos. Though they are not alive yet, they do contain the ability to develop into an organism, a human, and they were intentionally created to do just that. In regards to were the promise and statistics lie, it seems unethical to allow an intentionally manufactured collection of multipotent cells to go to waste when so many people in pain and nearing pre-mature death could benefit from them.
This is true but one fact always seems to be overloooked. An embryo is not the only place that stem cells can be taken from. Umbilical cord stem cells have the capability of changing into almost just as many cells as embryonic stem cells. Just a few weeks ago an autstic boy was cured with umbilical cord stem cells.
It's not. Some people vainly imagine stem cell research might be unethical because they oppose science or because stem cells typically come from embryos. The reason it is not unethical is because these embryos were either discarded after in vitrio fertilization procedures, or were aborted. There is absolutely nothing the slightest bit unethical about using such material in the search for new medical procedures, cures, or techniques that may prove of enormous benefit to all mankind.
Stem cells can come from aborted fetuses.
Some people that are fundamentally against this think it is unethical, because they think the fetuses shouldn't have been aborted in the first place.
Others think that people are trying to 'play God' because the research might be used for cloning humans or animals.
Ethical problems would be:
There was ethical concern over stem cell research because of where they originally collected stem cell from. They first thought that only aborted babies had the stem cells we were looking for, but they're not used anymore.
One concern with stem cell research is the ethical issue surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells, as the extraction process involves the destruction of human embryos. This raises ethical questions about the beginning of human life and the rights of embryos.
Stem cell research and therapy have sparked controversy due to ethical concerns related to the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from human embryos. This has raised ethical debates around the beginning of life and the destruction of embryos. Some oppose this research on moral or religious grounds, while others argue for the potential benefits of stem cell therapies in treating various diseases and injuries.
One argument against stem cell research is the ethical concern regarding the use of human embryos. Some individuals and groups believe that using embryonic stem cells involves the destruction of potential human life, which goes against their moral or religious beliefs.
You can find comprehensive information about stem cells from reputable sources such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR), and scientific journals like Nature and Cell Stem Cell. Additionally, academic institutions and research organizations often have dedicated websites or publications that provide detailed information on stem cell research and its applications.
ko
Human embryonic stem cell research is controversial because the arguments for it andsagainst it both involve ethical issues of life and death.
There was ethical concern over stem cell research because of where they originally collected stem cell from. They first thought that only aborted babies had the stem cells we were looking for, but they're not used anymore.
Stem cell research can lead to significant medical advancements and treatments for various diseases and conditions. However, ethical concerns exist regarding the use of embryonic stem cells. To address this, researchers are exploring alternative sources of stem cells, such as induced pluripotent stem cells. Additionally, regulations and guidelines are in place to ensure that stem cell research is conducted ethically.
There are several ethical concerns surrounding embryonic stem cell research. Some believe that stem cells are humans with rights, not "things, "because they believe life begins at conception. Others are concerned about what the future results of stem cell research and of cloning (a related endeavor) could mean for the way we value human life--that is, whether it will become more of a commodity.
One concern with stem cell research is the ethical issue surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells, as the extraction process involves the destruction of human embryos. This raises ethical questions about the beginning of human life and the rights of embryos.
Some ethical issues involving stem cell research include concerns about the source of the stem cells (such as embryonic stem cells), as this may involve the destruction of human embryos. There are also debates about consent and regulation regarding the use of stem cells for research and potential commercialization of stem cell therapies. Finally, there are concerns about equity and access to stem cell treatments, as they may not be available to everyone due to cost or limitations in healthcare systems.
i hate that i really need the answer and nobody answers it but when i dont need the answer for something it always comes out like ugggh FML
There has been amazing developments in stem cell research for the benefit of many problems. The best place to get information is http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/ .
Stem cell research and therapy have sparked controversy due to ethical concerns related to the use of embryonic stem cells obtained from human embryos. This has raised ethical debates around the beginning of life and the destruction of embryos. Some oppose this research on moral or religious grounds, while others argue for the potential benefits of stem cell therapies in treating various diseases and injuries.
they found a way to obtain stem cells without destroying an embryo - this removed all ethical concerns that were present for the use of embryonic stem cells
Why including the ethical question is important.... contrary to the above reply research into this subject is very important, as with all ethical and scientific issues where large amounts of public and private funds are being used. as I'm sure you are aware the ethics of stem cell research are a key part of the debate (e.g. women's rights, ownership of DNA material, ethics of paying for donations, possible scientific uses of stem cells) - and also an area where education about the differences between adult and embryonic stem cell sources is key - to make an argument supporting adult stem cell research without getting acknowledging the key ethical issues would suggest that you are uniformed about the subject matter. to provide a convincing argument the ethics should be covered and an argument put forward, including how ethics can be considered and integrated into the research process, and why ultimately you feel that the benefits of this research outweigh ethical concerns. there are actually no ethical issues abwt adult (somatic) stem cells. They are a completely different type of stem cell to the embryonic stem cells you are refering to. embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos and that's where all the ethics are but somatic stem cells are derived from anywhere on the human body that has stem cells e.g bone marrow, brain cells etc. and humans are not killed by taking them. so don't worry to much about the ethical issues accept for the possible ability of splicing genes, designer babies and cloning but that's a long way off.