HH and Hh; Hh & Hh;Hh &hh; HH & hh
Yes, it is possible if both parents carry a recessive blond hair gene that can be passed on to their child. Each parent contributes one gene for hair color, and if they both carry a recessive gene for blond hair, there is a chance that their child could have blond hair.
If two blonde haired people have a child the child will be blonde as everybody has two hair genes (one from each parent) and you pass one of your genes to your child, to be blonde you have to have two blonde haired genes and as you can only pass blonde genes to your child they will certainly be blonde.Source(s):GCSE science lessons Hi I am sorry to rain on your party but i believe you are incorrect. The reason why is because you can carry a trait but if you are an owner of trait then you have that trait plus others. For example my aunt has blonde hair and her hubby has blonde hair that went to dirty blonde to brown naturally. However, they have a red-head. How is this possible? Doesn't heredity have rules? I am so confussed.
Yes, it is possible. In one of the parent's family tree there were probably some blonde people, and so it is one of the DNA possibilities. It probably won't happen a lot, but it does happen. Also, there are some families (like mine) where some of the kids have blonde hair when they are young, but it gets darker as they get older.
Definitely. You could have a recessive gene from 4-5 generations ago, that was awakened by the gene of the other parent. Result could be red hair, blonde, or green, blue eyes. Without knowing the genectics of each parent at least 5 generations back, anything is possible for anyone.
Yes, it is possible for two blond haired parents to have a red haired child if both parents carry the gene for red hair. Red hair is a recessive trait, so if both parents carry the gene, there is a chance their child could inherit it.
The side because they are the same. The top because they are different.
Its possible, hair color and eye color have different strengths when it comes to genes. Brown is the strongest (most likely outcome), blonde hair is the weakest, and blue eyes are the weakest. These liks are about a 75 25 ratio so it is still possible but its unlikely.
Yes, it is possible if both parents carry a recessive blond hair gene that can be passed on to their child. Each parent contributes one gene for hair color, and if they both carry a recessive gene for blond hair, there is a chance that their child could have blond hair.
Both of the parents were heterozygous with the blonde hair allele, which is recessive. When there are two parents that are heterozygous, there is a 25% chance their offspring will get two of the recessive alleles. A punnett square can be useful when determining the different phenotypes and genotypes possible in offspring
ya
Everyone has at least two genes for hair color, but brown is dominant. If both parents have Brown-Blond genes, then they will have brown hair (because it is dominant over blond), but the child could get one blond gene from each parent and thus be Blond-Blond, and thus be blond.
you jackass
No, it's impossible to inherit a parent's dyed hair color.
because some one in the family had and and it recessive trait
If two blonde haired people have a child the child will be blonde as everybody has two hair genes (one from each parent) and you pass one of your genes to your child, to be blonde you have to have two blonde haired genes and as you can only pass blonde genes to your child they will certainly be blonde.Source(s):GCSE science lessons Hi I am sorry to rain on your party but i believe you are incorrect. The reason why is because you can carry a trait but if you are an owner of trait then you have that trait plus others. For example my aunt has blonde hair and her hubby has blonde hair that went to dirty blonde to brown naturally. However, they have a red-head. How is this possible? Doesn't heredity have rules? I am so confussed.
If the parent complains, you could possibly get fired.
Child Abuse has been defined as an act, or failure to act, on the part of a parent or caretaker that results in the death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, or exploitation of a child, or which places the child in an imminent risk of serious harm (42 U.S.C.A. § 5106g).Although your question lacks specific details, it is possible the the parent could be charged with child abuse in this case.Since the parent is aware of these acts against the child and has failed to act (i.e. call the police) the child is being abused due to the parent's failure...