The wave-mechanical model of the atom is required to explain the behavior of electrons in atoms, particularly their wave-like properties and the quantization of energy levels. This model integrates wave theory with the concept of particles, providing a more accurate description of the behavior of electrons within the atom. It helps explain phenomena such as electron orbitals, electron probability distributions, and the stability of atoms.
Rutherford's model failed to explain why elements emit light at specific frequencies when heated. This phenomenon, known as atomic emission spectra, was later explained by Niels Bohr's model of the atom which introduced the concept of quantized energy levels in the atom.
A Dalton's model of atom doesn't exist. Dalton principles are not in agreement with the discovery of isotopes and nonstoichiometric compounds.
Bohr.
No, Rutherford's model of the atom fails to explain the discrete spectral lines of elements. Bohr's model, which incorporates quantized energy levels and electrons moving in well-defined orbits, successfully explains the spectral lines of elements by linking them to the transitions between electron energy levels.
Niels Bohr is credited with developing the planetary model of the atom, which depicts electrons orbiting the nucleus in discrete energy levels. This model helped explain the stability of atoms and the emission of light at specific wavelengths.
Bohr's model of the atom doesn't explain hydrogen's flammability.
Rutherford's model of the atom was incomplete. He proposed a model in which electrons orbit the positively charged nucleus like planets around the sun. However, this model failed to explain the stability of the atom and the energy levels of electrons. It was later improved upon by Niels Bohr's model, which incorporated quantum mechanics concepts to explain these phenomena.
Thomson's model does not account for the existence of positively charged particles within the atom. It also does not explain the stability of the atom or the arrangement of electrons within the atom. Additionally, it fails to describe the presence of different energy levels in the atom.
it couldn't explain all the observed transitions
There has been more and more observations about the atom that has changed it since then. They revised it to explain the observations.
Rutherford's model failed to explain why elements emit light at specific frequencies when heated. This phenomenon, known as atomic emission spectra, was later explained by Niels Bohr's model of the atom which introduced the concept of quantized energy levels in the atom.
A Dalton's model of atom doesn't exist. Dalton principles are not in agreement with the discovery of isotopes and nonstoichiometric compounds.
It can be any atom if you have to explain the basic structure of it. But there should be the main parts like the nucleus,shells,protons,neutrons,electrons,etc.
Bohr.
The Bohr model of the atom helped to explain the quantization of electron energy levels, the stability of atoms, and the line spectrum observed in hydrogen. It proposed that electrons orbit the nucleus at specific energy levels, or shells, rather than in continuous orbits.
No, Rutherford's model of the atom fails to explain the discrete spectral lines of elements. Bohr's model, which incorporates quantized energy levels and electrons moving in well-defined orbits, successfully explains the spectral lines of elements by linking them to the transitions between electron energy levels.
Niels Bohr is credited with developing the planetary model of the atom, which depicts electrons orbiting the nucleus in discrete energy levels. This model helped explain the stability of atoms and the emission of light at specific wavelengths.