Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
There are more herbivores than carnivores in the Serengeti. This is because the herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting a larger number of carnivores that prey on them. The abundance of herbivores also supports a diverse ecosystem with various species of grazers and browsers.
There are generally more herbivores than carnivores in a food chain because energy is lost as it moves up trophic levels. Herbivores occupy the lower trophic levels and consume primary producers, which are more abundant. Additionally, herbivores have more efficient energy conversion rates compared to carnivores, which allows for a larger population size of herbivores to be sustained.
In an ecosystem, the energy pyramid dictates that there must be more herbivores than carnivores to sustain the higher trophic levels. This is because herbivores feed on primary producers, which are more abundant and reproduce quickly, providing a larger food base for herbivores. Carnivores have less energy available to sustain their populations since they must consume herbivores, which are fewer in number.
a herbiorous diet be argued as being more energy efficient tnan a carnivores
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
I think there is a pretty even amount of carnivores and herbivores. There might be a bit more herbivores because they need more of their species to survive, since the carnivores hunt them.
There are more herbivores than carnivores in the Serengeti. This is because the herbivores form the base of the food chain, supporting a larger number of carnivores that prey on them. The abundance of herbivores also supports a diverse ecosystem with various species of grazers and browsers.
There are generally more herbivores than carnivores in a food chain because energy is lost as it moves up trophic levels. Herbivores occupy the lower trophic levels and consume primary producers, which are more abundant. Additionally, herbivores have more efficient energy conversion rates compared to carnivores, which allows for a larger population size of herbivores to be sustained.
no. There were more herbivores than carnivores and u think all dinosaurs are carnivores! =(
In an ecosystem, the energy pyramid dictates that there must be more herbivores than carnivores to sustain the higher trophic levels. This is because herbivores feed on primary producers, which are more abundant and reproduce quickly, providing a larger food base for herbivores. Carnivores have less energy available to sustain their populations since they must consume herbivores, which are fewer in number.
There are fewer top carnivores than herbivores in a land ecosystem, primarily because they are more resources available to herbivores than carnivores. For example, there are many plants available for herbivores to eat, and carnivores have a limited choice of herbivores, depending on the environment. Think of it this way: If there were more carnivores than herbivores, then eventually, there will be a very little amount of herbivores left for carnivores to eat, and those carnivores will either have to adapt, migrate, or starve. 90 percent of energy is lost when one organism consumes another. This means that a carnivore gets 90 percent less energy from eating a herbivore than the herbivore gets from eating a plant. So, in order for a carnivore to get as much energy as a herbivore, it must eat more herbivores. So, if it were the other way around, the carnivores would not have enough food to eat.
a herbiorous diet be argued as being more energy efficient tnan a carnivores
In order for a food chain to be stable, there must always be less biomass as you go up in trophic levels (i.e. from plants to herbivores to carnivores). This is basically because energy is always lost as it is transferred to each successive level, since herbivores use some of the energy they get from plants to stay alive (leaving less for carnivores who eat them), and so there will always be fewer carnivores than herbivores.
It is unlikely for there to be more carnivores than herbivores in an ecosystem because the energy transfer efficiency is lower when energy moves up the food chain. So, there are typically more herbivores to support a smaller number of carnivores. Additionally, the population of carnivores is limited by the availability of prey.
There are many more herbivores than carnivores or omnivores.
No, crocodiles are not herbivores. They are carnivores, meaning they primarily eat meat. Their diet typically consists of fish, mammals, birds, and sometimes other reptiles.