0
What else can I help you with?
Was Wegener's continental drift hypothesis weakened because of viable mechanism for moving the continents was lacking?
Definitely. Wegener seems to have believed that the continents plowed through the oceanic crust like a ship plowing through water. The geologists of the day couldn't see how that could happen, mainly because it can't. Eventually, though, they came to realize that what's really happening is that the oceanic crust is moving on its own and carrying the continents with it. That's a lot more rational, but figuring that out required knowing that there are mid-ocean ridges, with lots of volcanic activity; that the oceanic crust is newest at those ridges and older as you get farther away; knowledge of where earthquakes occur worldwide; and many, many other things that we only first encountered in the era around World War II, long after Wegener was dead, and only started to get a real handle on decades after even that.
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid what plates could not move around?
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid, the tectonic plates, which are primarily composed of the Earth's crust and the uppermost part of the mantle (lithosphere), would be unable to move. This means that the plates, including the continental plates like the North American and Eurasian plates, as well as oceanic plates like the Pacific and Nazca plates, would become immobilized. The lack of movement would halt processes like continental drift, subduction, and seafloor spreading, fundamentally altering the planet's geology and surface dynamics.
Could an individual unable to absorb oxygen into the body perform cellular respiration?
An individual unable to absorb oxygen into the body is called dead, and is unable to perform cellular respiration.
Why was Leslie unable to do the project on Jacques cousteau?
Leslie was unable to do the project on Jacques Cousteau because her family does not have a television.
Why unable to precipitate DNA?
Ethanol
What animals don't live in forests?
Whales, dolphins, and other oceanic creatures would be unable to live in a forest.
Was Wegener's continental drift hypothesis weakened because of viable mechanism for moving the continents was lacking?
Definitely. Wegener seems to have believed that the continents plowed through the oceanic crust like a ship plowing through water. The geologists of the day couldn't see how that could happen, mainly because it can't. Eventually, though, they came to realize that what's really happening is that the oceanic crust is moving on its own and carrying the continents with it. That's a lot more rational, but figuring that out required knowing that there are mid-ocean ridges, with lots of volcanic activity; that the oceanic crust is newest at those ridges and older as you get farther away; knowledge of where earthquakes occur worldwide; and many, many other things that we only first encountered in the era around World War II, long after Wegener was dead, and only started to get a real handle on decades after even that.
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid what plates could not move around?
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid, the tectonic plates, which are primarily composed of the Earth's crust and the uppermost part of the mantle (lithosphere), would be unable to move. This means that the plates, including the continental plates like the North American and Eurasian plates, as well as oceanic plates like the Pacific and Nazca plates, would become immobilized. The lack of movement would halt processes like continental drift, subduction, and seafloor spreading, fundamentally altering the planet's geology and surface dynamics.
is unable A prifix?
Unable is not a prefix. The "un" in unable is the prefix.
What are synonyms of unable?
unable mis able
What does unabler mean?
Able means "can do". Unable means "cannot do". This could refer to an action, behavior, speech, etc. Examples: I'm unable to say why the experiment failed. I'm unable to walk. I'm unable to hear. I'm unable to move. I'm unable to feel.
What causes Earth's plates to move?
A brief summary of this long answer can be found by viewing the related question. For more information please read on!This is a complex question and is a subject of continuing ongoing scientific research. A summary of some of the hypothesised causal mechanisms of plate movement (based on scientists current understanding of the process) is given below:The primary source of energy for the motion of the lithospheric plates is dissipation of energy from the earth in the form of heat transfer. This heat transfer causes convection within the mantle and this convecting mantle material is hypothesised to exert a drag force on the base of the lithosphere. This is known as Basal Drag and was thought to be an important driver of tectonic plate motion until recently when advances in geophysical imaging techniques (specifically 3D seismic tomography) allowed geophysicists to form a more detailed model of the structure of the mantle but were unable to locate the necessary large scale convections structures. Further to this, geophysicists no longer believe that the asthenosphere has the necessary stiffness or rigidity to cause sufficient friction on the base of the lithosphere to be a significant driver of plate motion.Gravity is also believed to play a role in the driving of plate motions, both at mid-ocean-ridges (MOR) and at subduction zones. Both these mechanisms are also linked to the dissipation of heat and convection in that they are reliant on variations in the buoyancy of the lithosphere as temperature changes occur as described below:When hot (and so low density, buoyant) mantle material rises at an MOR, it is intruded into the pre-existing oceanic lithosphere as well as extruded at the upper surface. This newly intruded material is at a high temperature and cools relatively slowly. As such the newly formed oceanic lithosphere is buoyant and rises relative to the older cooler oceanic lithosphere further from the MOR. Even though this younger lithospheric crust is buoyant it is still significantly denser than the underlying upwelling hot mantle material and so "slides" down away from the crest in a process known as gravitational sliding. This is considered a secondary driving force as it only acts in close proximity to the ridge and does not transmit load into the surrounding lithosphere (it does not "push" the lithosphere away from the ridge, it is instead dragged - the tectonic regime is tensile, not compressive).Another more significant gravitational driving force of plate motion is that caused by the old, cool and so low buoyancy oceanic crust that sinks back into the mantle at subduction zones and acts to drag the attached oceanic lithosphere towards the plate boundary. This is known as slab pull and is thought to be a significant driver of plate motions as it has been observed that tectonic plates with subduction boundaries tend to move with a higher velocity than those without. Subducting oceanic slabs also promote another driving force of plate motion known as trench or slab suction. This is a process where the movement of the downgoing slab promotes flow in the nearby mantle. This flowing mantle material is thought to exert a traction both on the downgoing slab and the overlying non subducting slab, pulling them both towards the subduction zone.It should be noted that not all plates have significant subduction boundaries and yet still undergo plate movements so it is possible that a combination of all these mechanisms influences plate movement (as well as the possibility that there is some as yet undiscovered driving force that has a significant role).The above is a simple summary of a complex topic and as has been stated the causal mechanisms that drive the motions of tectonic plates are not fully understood and as such the reader should remember that this is a current and active area of research in geophysics and so the hypotheses summarised above may be accepted, rejected or modified over time!For more information, please see the related link.
What does impentrable mean?
Unable to be pierced. Or unable to be comprehended.
Is it will not be able to meet with you or is it unable to meet with you?
Unable to meet with you!
What part of speech is the word unable?
Unable is an adjective.
What is the plural of unable?
The word unable is an adjective, and has no plural.
What is the anagram for unable?
An anagram of "unable" is the word nebula.
