no
Definitely. Wegener seems to have believed that the continents plowed through the oceanic crust like a ship plowing through water. The geologists of the day couldn't see how that could happen, mainly because it can't. Eventually, though, they came to realize that what's really happening is that the oceanic crust is moving on its own and carrying the continents with it. That's a lot more rational, but figuring that out required knowing that there are mid-ocean ridges, with lots of volcanic activity; that the oceanic crust is newest at those ridges and older as you get farther away; knowledge of where earthquakes occur worldwide; and many, many other things that we only first encountered in the era around World War II, long after Wegener was dead, and only started to get a real handle on decades after even that.
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid, the tectonic plates, which are primarily composed of the Earth's crust and the uppermost part of the mantle (lithosphere), would be unable to move. This means that the plates, including the continental plates like the North American and Eurasian plates, as well as oceanic plates like the Pacific and Nazca plates, would become immobilized. The lack of movement would halt processes like continental drift, subduction, and seafloor spreading, fundamentally altering the planet's geology and surface dynamics.
An individual unable to absorb oxygen into the body is called dead, and is unable to perform cellular respiration.
Leslie was unable to do the project on Jacques Cousteau because her family does not have a television.
Ethanol
Whales, dolphins, and other oceanic creatures would be unable to live in a forest.
Definitely. Wegener seems to have believed that the continents plowed through the oceanic crust like a ship plowing through water. The geologists of the day couldn't see how that could happen, mainly because it can't. Eventually, though, they came to realize that what's really happening is that the oceanic crust is moving on its own and carrying the continents with it. That's a lot more rational, but figuring that out required knowing that there are mid-ocean ridges, with lots of volcanic activity; that the oceanic crust is newest at those ridges and older as you get farther away; knowledge of where earthquakes occur worldwide; and many, many other things that we only first encountered in the era around World War II, long after Wegener was dead, and only started to get a real handle on decades after even that.
If the Earth's mantle were completely solid, the tectonic plates, which are primarily composed of the Earth's crust and the uppermost part of the mantle (lithosphere), would be unable to move. This means that the plates, including the continental plates like the North American and Eurasian plates, as well as oceanic plates like the Pacific and Nazca plates, would become immobilized. The lack of movement would halt processes like continental drift, subduction, and seafloor spreading, fundamentally altering the planet's geology and surface dynamics.
Unable is not a prefix. The "un" in unable is the prefix.
unable mis able
Able means "can do". Unable means "cannot do". This could refer to an action, behavior, speech, etc. Examples: I'm unable to say why the experiment failed. I'm unable to walk. I'm unable to hear. I'm unable to move. I'm unable to feel.
Unable to be pierced. Or unable to be comprehended.
Unable to meet with you!
Unable, incapable
Unable is an adjective.
An anagram of "unable" is the word nebula.
The word unable is an adjective, and has no plural.