This question may be nearly impossible to answer because of all the uncertainty involving the calculations, not to mention the disagreement that is likely to occur regarding where to draw the line on what energy is used directly and indirectly to make the bag. What I mean by that is do you count only the energy used by, say, the machines that process the raw materials that become the bags, or do you also count the energy used to make the raw materials and transport them to the plastic-bag factory? Do you count the energy used to power the lights in the factory? How about the soda machines in the cafeteria that serve the workers who make the bags? What about the computers used by the managers to oversee operations? If you do count those PCs, is it fair to count all the power they consume or just some, to account for the time when the PCs are used to surf the internet or to read email not directly related to the manufacture of the plastic bags? Having said all that, it's safe to say that the dollar cost of making a plastic bag is considerably less then the price of the bag, itself. So, if the market price of a bag is 25 cents, it's safe to assume the manufacturer's costs are much less. If it costs the manufacturer 15 cents to make, and if a third of that is the cost of energy, then about a nickel's worth of energy is used to make the bag. I guess the next step would be to figure how many kilowatt-hours a nickel will buy you.
It can run a PC for 3 hours and a T.V for 3.
Answer:
It is easier to discus this in terms of CO2 produced, the energy can then be identified from easily obtained CO2/energy factors for the power sources in each area.
Australian data indicates about 0.6 oz of CO2 is generated per oz of glass wine bottle produced.W ine bottles typically weighs about 23 oz, so about 13.8 oz of CO2 is generated for each glass wine bottle manufactured. As an aside, the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) reports that the manufacture of plastic drink bottles generates 1 oz of CO2 per oz of plastic bottle. However as plastic bottles weigh less than glass bottles each unit generates about 1.9 oz of CO2 . So manufacturing of a glass wine bottle produces 7.3 times more CO2 is generated than a plastic one. Recycling the bottle for re-use (not melting down and re-manufacture) saves all of the CO2 and thus all of the energy.
Three natural resources that are saved by recycling steel are iron ore, coal, and limestone. Recycling steel reduces the need for extracting and mining these resources, which helps conserve natural reserves and reduce environmental impacts associated with the extraction process. Additionally, recycling steel requires less energy compared to producing steel from raw materials, resulting in significant energy savings.
Recycling steel can save up to 74% of the energy needed to produce it from raw materials. This reduction in energy consumption helps to conserve resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with steel production.
Potential energy can be saved up for future use. This type of energy is stored in an object based on its position or configuration, ready to be converted into kinetic energy when needed. Examples include a wound-up spring or water held in an elevated reservoir.
Recycling helps reduce the need for new raw materials to be extracted and processed, which in turn reduces greenhouse gas emissions from activities like mining and manufacturing. It also helps reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills, which can emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Overall, widespread recycling can contribute to mitigating global warming by conserving resources and reducing carbon emissions.
The production of paper contributes to deforestation, leads to the loss of habitats for wildlife, and requires large amounts of water and energy. Additionally, paper waste accounts for a significant portion of municipal solid waste and can contribute to pollution if not properly disposed of through recycling or composting.
Aluminium is called ''Energy Bank'' because the energy saved in recycling.
The energy saved by recycling one aluminum can is the equivalent to running a TV for four hours.
around 95%
40%
im not saying
3,750
You can run a TV for three hours on the energy saved by recycling one aluminium can.
It saves energy because it reuses its self so your not adding anything extra, so basically its a process of using the same amount of material at the sametime
Three natural resources that are saved by recycling steel are iron ore, coal, and limestone. Recycling steel reduces the need for extracting and mining these resources, which helps conserve natural reserves and reduce environmental impacts associated with the extraction process. Additionally, recycling steel requires less energy compared to producing steel from raw materials, resulting in significant energy savings.
they are recycled resources
$600/hour
wood