First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
Yes, the Romans did eat mushrooms. They particularly enjoyed a variety of wild mushrooms, such as boletus and truffles, which were considered delicacies. Mushrooms were often used in various dishes and sauces in Roman cuisine.
No, the Romans were not the first people to use limestone. Limestone has been used in construction for thousands of years by various ancient civilizations, including the Egyptians, Greeks, and Mesopotamians. The Romans, however, did utilize limestone extensively in their architecture and construction projects.
they thought there was a god there.
The Romans called the city Aquae Sulis, which is now modern-day Bath in the United Kingdom. It was known for its natural hot springs, which the Romans built baths around for public use.
Many Christians believe that Jesus died for all people, not just a select group. The concept of Jesus dying for all of humanity is often seen as a central tenet of Christian faith, emphasizing the idea of salvation for all who believe in him.
The titles of Roman emperors were Augustus or Caesar.
The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.
The title of the Roman emperors was Augustus (the venerable one). At the beginning of rule by emperors they were also called Caesars. Later Caesar became the title of the junior emperors. The Romans knew that the emperors were absolute ruler and that is what they thought of them. Many emperors liked to assocate themselves with a divinity
Romans
From 27 BC to 476 AD the Romans had emperors.
Romans
they valued the emperors the most
When Christianity was endorsed by the Christian Romans Emperors, these emperors appointed Christian senators.
Romans emperors reigned for life. Diocletian and Maximian were the only emperors who abdicated.
The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.
No. The Romans had an official total of 178 emperors. This number covers the entire empire, western part and eastern part.
Augustus encouraged Romans to accept the eastern practice of deifying emperors after their death. (The Egyptian Pharaohs had always been regarded as gods). Augustus himself was made a god after his death, and so was his wife Livia. Tiberius and Caligula were not made gods (they were unpopular) but Claudius was. Many Roman emperors were deified after death, many were not. It depended on how popular they were.