Creations scientists say that star formation is almost impossible because of certain scientific laws that prevent it from happening. Gas naturally expands and fills its container, in space there is no container. It expands indefinitely and is very resistant to compression. They also say that gas pressure exceeds the gravity that a typical nebula creates therefore allowing them to expand without collapsing onto themselves. Another factor is the gas' magnetic field. Weak when dispersed, strong when compressed. The concentrated magnetic pressure would only cause the gas to expand again. Like trying to put two magnets together with the same pole facing each other: N-N, or S-S. They would just push apart. These are just a couple of reasons why creationists claim that we don't see stars forming.
Creationists support their claims with material that was written prior to 1986 and material that was written by people without appropriate training in astrophysics. Their claims were firmly demolished in 1993 when the Hubble Telescope began sending its first pictures of star forming areas in the galaxy. It provided evidence of star formation at all stages of the process. Modern technology uses a variety of techniques (xrays and infra red spectrometry and such) to penetrate the dust clouds of star forming mats so that we can see right to the center of the forming star. Other techniques can measure the composition of the forming star which provide information about the stage of formation that the proto-star has reached.
A star develops from a giant, slowly rotating cloud that is made up entirely or almost entirely of hydrogen and helium. Due to its own gravitational pull, the cloud begins to collapse inward, and as it shrinks, it spins more and more quickly, with the outer parts becoming a disk while the innermost parts become a roughly spherical clump. This collapsing material grows hotter and denser, forming a ball-shaped proto-star. When the heat and pressure in the proto-star reaches about 1.8 degrees F (1 million degrees C), atomic nuclei that normally repel each other start fusing together, and the star ignites. Nuclear fusion converts a small amount of the mass of these atoms into extraordinary amounts of energy - for instance, 1 gram of mass converted entirely to energy would be equal to an explosion of roughly 22,000 tons of TNT.
The further away the galaxy the faster the star nurseries make stars. The current pattern suggests that there are now considerably less stars being formed than there was in the past.
Although stars form over millions to billions of years, one amateur astronomer was lucky enough to catch the actual instant when a forming star ignited. There can be no doubt, even for amateurs, that stars are continuing to form.
Yes, star formation has been observed in various stages across different wavelengths of light, such as in young star clusters in our own galaxy and in distant galaxies through telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope. These observations have provided valuable insights into the process of how stars form from collapsing clouds of gas and dust.
neutron star has been observed at the center of a supernova remnant, known as the Crab Nebula. This neutron star, also called a pulsar, spins rapidly, emitting beams of radiation that are observed as pulses by astronomers.
Star Wars Movies do not affect the formation of magma.
The star Spica is a well-known star and has been observed since ancient times. It is part of the constellation Virgo and has been documented in numerous historical records and star catalogs.
I said WHERE?!
Star formation was a one-time event. Star decay and death still occur, but stars can only be newly observed, not newly formed.
neutron star has been observed at the center of a supernova remnant, known as the Crab Nebula. This neutron star, also called a pulsar, spins rapidly, emitting beams of radiation that are observed as pulses by astronomers.
Observational evidence for continuous star formation includes the presence of young stars observed in various stages of formation in star-forming regions, such as molecular clouds. Measurements of varying ages of stars within a star cluster also support the idea of continuous star formation over time. Additionally, the detection of ongoing star formation in galaxies of different ages and redshifts provides further evidence for the continuous nature of the process.
No
Yes. No star has ever been observed that does not. Empirical observational evidencetherefore suggests that every star does, although there is yet no theoretical explanationfor why this should be true.
Star Wars Movies do not affect the formation of magma.
The brightest star in the sky is Sirius, followed by Canopus and Alpha Centauri. These stars are easily visible in the night sky and have been observed for centuries.
The star Spica is a well-known star and has been observed since ancient times. It is part of the constellation Virgo and has been documented in numerous historical records and star catalogs.
Not exactly: Star formation is believed to be a slow process, compared to a human lifetime; scientists have, however, seen stars in different phases of their formation.
The term hypervelocity star relates to the velocity of the star and has no relation to it's size or mass. So far only 16 hypervelocity stars have been observed.
None has ever been awarded that rank by the US Government.
A Star
No, the sun has always been a star. It formed from a collapsing cloud of gas and dust in a process called nuclear fusion, where hydrogen atoms fuse to form helium, producing energy and light. This distinguishes it from planets, which form from the leftover material surrounding a star during its formation.