0
Not the existence of quasars, but the fact that all quasars are distant from us.
The best explanation for what we observe when we see quasars is that they are super-massive black holes in early galaxies, burning up solar "fuel" so rapidly that they eventually run out. We do not observe any quasars near to us, so the conditions that allowed quasars to form must have existed only several billion years ago. If our Universe has not changed its basic structure and density over the last 15 billion years or so, then the conditions that would allow quasars would allow them to exist at any time over that span. This would mean that there should be just as many quasars close to us as there are far from us. But we just don't see that. As is the case with many of the things we see, this is easy to explain via Big Bang Cosmology but almost impossible to explain with any alternative.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the big bang theory support the big rip theory?
No
Did the galactic cluster support the big bang theory?
Yes, the distribution and movement of galaxies in galactic clusters provide evidence for the big bang theory. The observation of cosmic microwave background radiation, galaxy redshift, and the uniform expansion of the universe within these clusters all support the theory of the universe originating from a hot, dense state and expanding over time.
How does the evidence of the wmap and COBE support the big bang theory?
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Big bang theory of the Philippines?
The Big Bang Theory of the Philippines refers to the theory that the archipelago was formed through a series of tectonic activities and volcanic eruptions. It is believed that millions of years ago, underwater volcanic eruptions pushed up and formed the islands that make up the Philippines. This geological process is similar to the Big Bang theory of the universe, where an initial explosion led to the formation of everything in existence.
How is the big bang theory is an example od scienctific theory?
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
Does the big bang theory support the big rip theory?
No
Did the galactic cluster support the big bang theory?
Yes, the distribution and movement of galaxies in galactic clusters provide evidence for the big bang theory. The observation of cosmic microwave background radiation, galaxy redshift, and the uniform expansion of the universe within these clusters all support the theory of the universe originating from a hot, dense state and expanding over time.
When it comes to our existence what does the big bang theory not describe or account for?
The "Big Bang Theory" may account for the events that happened during the first few seconds or minutes of the universe's existence. It doesn't purport to explain anything more recent than that.
How did the big bang theory make the earth?
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for (or made) existence within the universe, the actual formation of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
How does Eisenstein's theory of relativity support the Big Bang theory?
The Theory of Relativity was created by Einstein, not by Eisenstein. Comment: The most obvious thing is that Einstein's equations predicted that the Universe was not "static". So a "Big Bang", expanding Universe fits the theory.
How does the evidence of the wmap and COBE support the big bang theory?
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
How does the big bang theory support the conculsion that the universe is expanding?
Cos it is an amazing tv show
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
Big bang theory of the Philippines?
The Big Bang Theory of the Philippines refers to the theory that the archipelago was formed through a series of tectonic activities and volcanic eruptions. It is believed that millions of years ago, underwater volcanic eruptions pushed up and formed the islands that make up the Philippines. This geological process is similar to the Big Bang theory of the universe, where an initial explosion led to the formation of everything in existence.
How is the big bang theory is an example od scienctific theory?
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
How does the presence of CMBR support the big bang theory?
Basically, in that it closely agrees to what is expected from the Big Bang - this includes the existence of the background radiation, its approximate temperature, and its anisotropies. For more details, I suggest you read some more about the cosmic microwave background radiation - for example, you might start with the corresponding Wikipedia article.
Is the big bang against the Bible?
I don't think the big bang has an opinion about the Bible. Is it against the teachings of the Bible? The Bible says God spoke and the universe leaped into existence. The big bang could be the mechanism for this, or it could not be, it is only a theory.
