support
hypothesis
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
No, a hypothesis in science is not accepted simply because it cannot be proven wrong. For a hypothesis to be accepted, it should be tested through experiments or observations that can potentially disprove it. This process helps ensure that the hypothesis is supported by evidence and is not simply a matter of lack of contrary evidence.
A scientific hypothesis is testable, falsifiable, and based on observable evidence. It can be validated or invalidated through empirical evidence and experimentation. If a hypothesis meets these criteria, it is considered scientific.
The Big Bang is a theory in cosmology that explains the origin and evolution of the universe, supported by a significant amount of observational evidence. It is not a hypothesis, as a hypothesis is an initial explanation to be tested and either supported or rejected based on evidence.
The evidence that made you come to that conclusion. Remember that a hypothesis is an educated guess
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
hypothesis
Apex: conclusion
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Hypothesis.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.
Well...it all depends on the hypothesis. For example, if you know exactly how to back it up with evidence, than very easy. But...if your hypothesis is kind of 'far out', and finding evidence will be difficult, then writing it will be hard.
Accept fossil evidence, anatomical evidence, molecular evidence
Data