No ghandi did not set himself on fire nor did he become on fire he was shot when he was being taken to speak for the public
the reason the person may have asked this was because he was cremated AFTER he died.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, Mahatma Gandhi did not set himself on fire. He practiced nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience to fight for India's independence from British rule. Gandhi's methods included fasting, marches, and peaceful protests.
Yes, grass can be set on fire if exposed to a flame or sufficient heat source. Dry grass is more flammable than wet grass. It is important to exercise caution when setting grass on fire, as fires can quickly spread out of control.
Gandhi's distinctive nose was likely just a physical trait he was born with and does not have any significance in relation to his personality or achievements. It is not uncommon for people to have unique physical features that set them apart from others.
Well, typically there are no trees in a desert, so you just call it a fire. no special name.
there is no oxygen on the moon, therefore, a fire could not start because in the fire triangle, (the materials needed to start a fire) the fire needs oxygen, which the moon does not have, fuel, and heat.
Helium hasn't an effect.