0
Stabilizing selection is where a population is favored by just the right amount of a certain trait, and if they don't have the right amount of that certain trait then they die.
Example: Human babies and birth weight, if the baby is too small, i gets sick. If the baby is too big, it cannot get through the pelvis; but just the right weight and it will come out lively and well.
Disruptive selection is when an animal has to fit in with its environment; I.E., camouflage.
What else can I help you with?
How are directional and stabilizing selection different?
Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of a trait distribution, leading to a shift in the population's trait mean over time. In contrast, stabilizing selection favors individuals with intermediate traits, reducing variation and maintaining the status quo by selecting against extremes. While directional selection promotes change in a trait, stabilizing selection promotes stability within a population's traits.
The effects of stabilizing directional and disruptive selection on variations in a trait over time?
Let us use tallness in men and women as our example. In stabilizing selection a normal distribution of heights would be expected as the selective environment would not select against having all variants present in the population. In directional selection you would see men and women getting increasingly taller ( or, perhaps shorter ) as natural selection selected the variants that were more reproductively successful in the immediate environment. ( say women's mate choice went into overdrive for tall men ) Disruptive selection is the distribution of traits that are at either tail of the distribution. Both short and tall people are represented, but no intermediates. These two dichotomous traits are seen in nature when one species feeds on two different food sources in the same area. Rather like small and large beaked birds. How humans could go through disruptive selection I leave to your analysis.
Which tends to occur more quickly natural selection or artificial selection?
Artificial selection tends to occur more quickly than natural selection because it involves intentional breeding by humans to promote desired traits in organisms. This focused approach can lead to rapid changes in specific characteristics over a few generations. In contrast, natural selection operates through environmental pressures and can take much longer for significant changes to occur, as it relies on random genetic variations and survival advantages over time.
What concept of microscopy deals with the ability of the specimen to stand out against its background?
Contrast in microscopy refers to the ability of the specimen to be distinguished from its background. Techniques such as staining, phase contrast, and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy can enhance contrast in microscopy.
Is barium a contrast medium?
Yes, barium is a contrast medium and is actually one of the most common of the contrast mediums used in enemas and other x-ray based tests. Iodine is another contrast medium that is quite common.
How are directional and stabilizing selection different?
Directional selection favors individuals at one extreme of a trait distribution, leading to a shift in the population's trait mean over time. In contrast, stabilizing selection favors individuals with intermediate traits, reducing variation and maintaining the status quo by selecting against extremes. While directional selection promotes change in a trait, stabilizing selection promotes stability within a population's traits.
The effects of stabilizing directional and disruptive selection on variations in a trait over time?
Let us use tallness in men and women as our example. In stabilizing selection a normal distribution of heights would be expected as the selective environment would not select against having all variants present in the population. In directional selection you would see men and women getting increasingly taller ( or, perhaps shorter ) as natural selection selected the variants that were more reproductively successful in the immediate environment. ( say women's mate choice went into overdrive for tall men ) Disruptive selection is the distribution of traits that are at either tail of the distribution. Both short and tall people are represented, but no intermediates. These two dichotomous traits are seen in nature when one species feeds on two different food sources in the same area. Rather like small and large beaked birds. How humans could go through disruptive selection I leave to your analysis.
What is nondirectional hypothesis?
A non-directional hypothesis only proposes a relationship. In contrast, a directional hypothesis also proposes a direction in the relationship. For example, when one variable increases, the other will decrease.
What is directional hypothesis?
A non-directional hypothesis only proposes a relationship. In contrast, a directional hypothesis also proposes a direction in the relationship. For example, when one variable increases, the other will decrease.
Do the pectorialis major and pectoralis minor produce different movement?
Yes, the pectoralis major is responsible for movements like arm flexion and horizontal adduction of the shoulder. In contrast, the pectoralis minor is involved in stabilizing the scapula by drawing it forward and downward.
Compare and contrast natural selection and artificial selection?
Natural selection is when contemporary species rose from ancestors that survived due to their physical characteristics in their habitats. A well-known example is the Galapagos Islands and how the animals on the islands adapted to their environments. Darwin convinced the biology world that diversity in organisms came from evolution (descent without modification). Artificial selection is when humans intentionally breed animals for certain traits. Unlike natural selection, where only the fittest survive, artificial selection is for human's likings. Many crops that are grown are part of artificial selection.
Is artificial selection and natural selection the same at the molecular level?
Artificial selection and natural selection are not the same at the molecular level. Artificial selection is driven by human breeding preferences, which can lead to rapid and targeted changes in molecular traits. In contrast, natural selection is driven by environmental pressures, leading to adaptations that improve an organism's fitness in its natural environment.
Compare and contrast natural selection and evolution?
Natural selection is the most powerful driver of evolution and it is the only mechanism of evolution ( genetic drift and gene flow are two other mechanisms ) that leads to adaptive change. Natural selection is the nonrandom survival and reproductive success of of randomly varying organisms. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms.
What is the meaning of conometer?
A Conometer is a simple device for measuring the variation of luminance of an electronic display (e.g. LCD screen) with viewing direction within a certain viewing cone. From two directional distributions of luminance (e.g. black, white) the corresponding contrast can be evaluated.
Which tends to occur more quickly natural selection or artificial selection?
Artificial selection tends to occur more quickly than natural selection because it involves intentional breeding by humans to promote desired traits in organisms. This focused approach can lead to rapid changes in specific characteristics over a few generations. In contrast, natural selection operates through environmental pressures and can take much longer for significant changes to occur, as it relies on random genetic variations and survival advantages over time.
How can I improve the quality of my blurry film photos?
To improve the quality of blurry film photos, you can try using photo editing software to sharpen the image, adjust the contrast and brightness, and reduce noise. Additionally, consider using a tripod or stabilizing the camera to prevent blurriness in future photos.
Is it in Contrast with or in contrast to?
Normally it is "in contrast with..." But "to" is used when the difference is being emphasized.
