Not much is the short answer. The Japanese earthquake was associated with their subduction zone, whereas the Canterbury one was the re-activation of an old but previously unknown shear fault on the Canterbury Plains - in other words on the upper crust well away from the shear zone of the Alpine Fault.
In Lyttleton, there was a small tsunami, but essentially benign.
similerities betweenn BD&ausralia
New Zealand is more skuxx aka cool but Japan has cool cars
Japan did not hate New Zealand. During World War II, Japan embarked upon a campaign of dominance of the Pacific, and this included the islands of New Zealand.
Japan and Canada have the same colors on their national flags. Also, they both have maple trees- but Canada uses them, not Japan
yes and no becuase in new zealand the sushi is the same style of how you make it but it tastes different. in japan you do not find cooked meat in sushi wheres in new zealand you do.
Considering 2012 is not the end of the world, no. Between New Zealand and Japan it's just a bad start to 2011.
of,course
Italy has lot of cites and Japan has lots of cites
The monetary unit in the nation of Japan is the Japanese Yen. The monetary unit of New Zealand is the New Zealand dollar.
they both are crowded
dafuq
idk lol
Japan (3.11) New Zealand (Chirstchurch) Chile, Pakistan, Aleutian Islands in Alaska
That when your about to enter a house in japan u have to take your shoes off.
Japan got it the hardest as it is the epicentre of the earth. But New Zealand, Australia, Hawaii and i think California got hit as well, but very minor.
No, the 2011 Japan earthquake was a megathrust earthquake, specifically a subduction zone earthquake. It occurred along the boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate, where the Pacific Plate is subducting beneath the North American Plate.
A tsunami hit japan after the earthquake.