0.5 light speed
The Millennium Falcon can go .5 faster than light speed, which is 390,365,697,829 metres per second
Warp speed is faster than the speed of Light. Warp 1 is the speed of light and warp 2 is 10X the warp 3 is 27X and it increases by a power of 3 for every level. At warp 5 for example you could make to the closest star Proxima Centauri 4.22 lights years away. It would take hours instead of years to get there, but the power needed to generate that kind of speed would be enormous. Warp is so fast that objects come to you through a distress in space. For generating this we would have to concentrate energy so vast to distort space time. Also known as wormhole movement explained by Einstein's law of relativity.
The speed of light is a constant, so the acceleration is zero. However, light IS affected by gravity, and gravity causes an acceleration. How does this balance? The light moves at the same speed - the speed of light, abbreviated "c" - but loses or gains energy as the light moves toward or away from the gravity source. In gaining energy (without speeding up!) the frequency of the light is increased and the wavelength of the light (or any electromagnetic energy) is decreased, In losing energy, the wavelength is increased and the wavelength decreased. This could be a trick question, of course. Light from a star wouldn't be travelling from earth, unless we are talking about reflected light, which would not be particularly intense, but it is not out of the question.
The Radius of the Star is 10 KM. Now we need to find the diameter. Circumference equals pi times the Diameter. That is twice the Radius, which is 20. Now we need to get the Diameter. We multiply the diameter by pi. 20 times 3.1416. 20 * 3.1416 = 62.838. Now we multiply the circumference in kilometers by the speed. 62.832 * 642 = 40,338. Now we take the speed of light, 299,997 per second and divide it into the speed of a point on the equator of our star going 40,338 kilometers per second. 40338 / 299997 = 0.1345
If you mean why it couldn't go into light speed in "The Empire Strikes Back," it's because of engine trouble
In the language of Star Trek it is, like the word mach implies a speed faster than sound. Don't know if warp is used to describe faster than light speeds in real life.
None. According to Einstein's Theory - NOTHING can travel as fast as - or faster than the speed of light. so - technically - it is true - when you look see a star in the sky - that is 1 light year away - you are actually seeing what it looked like 1 year ago - when the light left the star!!!!!
No. Bullets travel from a few hundred feet per second up to several thousand feet per second, and lightening is much faster than that. According to various sources, lightening travels at either the speed of light, or about half of that, or about a third of that.
The Millennium Falcon can go .5 faster than light speed, which is 390,365,697,829 metres per second
Since stars are so far away, it takes a very long time for their light to reach us. The closest star to our sun is Proxima Centauri, which is 4.218 light-years away. This means that it would take 4.218 years for light (travelling at a speed of 300,000 km/s) to reach us from this star. As a result of this time delay (4.218 years), we are not seeing this star as it is right now - we are seeing it as it was, 4.218 years ago.The Andromeda Galaxy, for example, is significantly further away: it's approximately 2.5 million light-years from us. Since it has taken about 2.5 million years for the light from this galaxy to reach us, it is 2.5 millions years older than it currently appears to be.Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Even if it were possible for a distant star to travel this speed away from us, or even faster than this, it would mean that the light from this star would never be able to reach us.The most distant stars (in other galaxies) may appear to be moving close to - or faster than - the speed of light. This is due to the expansion of the fabric of the universe.
A football-shaped star-ship for effective speed faster than light.
I'm afraid you would never reach it. The furthest star, and thus the furthest galaxies are receding faster than the speed of light.
no Theoretically, if you could travel faster than the speed of light, you could go back in time. When you look through a telescope at a distant star, you are looking back in time because the light from the star, that you are seeing now, may have taken hundreds of years to travel from the star to your eye. If you can travel faster than light, you could travel to the star and arrive before the light you're seeing now left the star in the first place. Therefore you travelled to a time previous to when the light left.
Since Laser is light and light is faster than anything we know of on earth the laser is faster, especially if it is a constant beam. Bullets can travel faster than sound, but still nowhere near the speed of light. Besides, despite what you see in Star Wars, there are not laser guns, only lasers.
You would have to be travelling faster than the speed of light in order to do this. And, theoretically speaking, this would be impossible to do.However, if you were possible to travel faster than the speed of light, you would need to be travelling 1.25x the speed of light (which is about 3.75 x 108 m/s2).
For example, if a star is at a distance of 5 light-years, it will take 5 years to travel there at the speed of light.
Yes.