Yes 300 is the retelling of the brave Spartan warriors who fought against Persia, now in modern days called Iran.
300 is VERY fact filled, right down to individual words spoken. These were really said:
"They look thirsty!" - Spartan
"Then Let's give them something to drink!" - Leonidas
"Immortals? We'll put their name to the test!" - Leonidas
"Only Spartan Women produce real men" - Gorgo
"We will fight in the shade" - Dieneces
"Tonight we dine in Hell" - Leonidas
Persian - "Spartans! Hand over your arms!"
Leonidas - "Come and get Them"
Ephialtes however was not deformed, nor ex-Spartan. He lived in Malis, a town in the hills south of Thermopylae. The number of Persians is actually underrated in the film!! Herodotus records there being 5,283,220 Persians (but that is probably a lie!) to 300's 2,000,000!!
In the film they actually put a piece of unhistorical clothing on the Spartans! They wore no sandals, from childhood they walked over sharp rocks and ashes to harden their soles. Other than that and a missing cuirass, their armor is fairly accurate.
Also, the Immortals were not souless beasts, just 10,000 crack troops recruited by Xerxes to be his bodyguard. They were not ninjaesque; they looked very much like the emissaries at the beginning of the movie.
Of Course 300 is a retelling of Thermopylae by the Spartans (Delios prior to the battle of Platea). So all that is shown in 300 is what the Spartans of course could have recounted it as! Deformed old creatures, huge half naked almost indestructable warriors. It's all relative!
However, a large number of warriors were left out of the movie. Alongside the 300 Spartans were most notably 700 Thespians and the 'Noble Band' of 300 Theban homosexuals who both stayed to the bitter end even though Leonidas had ordered the 6000 odd other Greeks to leave alongwith the Thespians the night before their annihilation.
The honours that people give always
Pass to those use-besotted gentleman
Whose numbskull courage is a kind of fear,
A fear of thought and of the oafish mothers
('Or with your shield or on it') in their rear.
Spartans cannot retreat. Why then, their praise
For going forward should be less than others.
But we, actors and critics of one play,
Of sober witted judgement, who could see
So many roads, and chose the Spartan way,
What has the popular report to say
Of us, the Thespians at Thermopylae?
-Norman Cameron
no they are not accurate the movie is fictional The movie is not entirely fictional. Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, and Lucilla were real people. Gladiator is a semi-remake of the 1964 movie The Fall of the Roman Empire. Both movies are accurate in some ways and less accurate in others. Both are good entertainment, but Gladiator is generally more accurate. In Gladiator, Marcus Aurelius is murdered by Commodus. The Fall of the Roman Empire is slightly more accurate in this regard, with Marcus Aurelius poisoned, but Commodus had nothing to do with it. [The real Marcus Aurelius probably died of plague.] At the end of both movies, Commodus dies fighting in the arena. The real Commodus did enjoy fighting as a gladiator, but he did not die in that way by contemporary account. Conspirators got him drunk until he fell asleep, and they had him strangled by a wrestler. And his sister Lucilla is left alive at the end of both movies, but in actuality she died earlier; executed by Commodus for plotting against him. The real story would sell fewer tickets if Hollywood did not make some slight changes.
Not completely, but it many ways it was very accurate. I saw the movie many years ago, and it was apparent that the producers strived for an accurate telling of this event. Some things had to be changed. For instance, sculpture and other art of that time indicates that Greek soldiers fought naked except for their armor. This is one historical accuaracy that would not be acceptable for movie audiences in 1962, or in 2007 for that matter.
There are several inaccuracies in Spartacus.
The series shows many gladiators being killed in the arena. Historically, most gladiators were not killed in the arena due to the high cost in purchasing and training them.
Oneomaeus was a Gaul, this is not depicted in the show.
Spartacus commanded over 50,000 slaves in battle. The show makes it look like his numbers were in the hundreds, not thousands.
300 was the movie based on the battle of Thermopolaye. It took place on Thermopolaye pass, hence the name.
Xerxes The story will be the same heft as '300' but it cover a much, much greater span of time -- it's 10 years, not three days… This is a more complex story. The story is so much larger. The Spartans in '300' were being enclosed by the page as the world got smaller. This story has truly vast subjects. The Athenian naval fleet, for instance, is a massive artistic undertaking and it dwarfed by the Persian fleet, which is also shown in this story. The story has elements of espionage, too, and it's a sweeping tale with gods and warriors.
The Battle of Thermopylae in the Ancient Greek Wars against the Persian Empire. it deals with the valiant stand of the 300 Spartans and tends to ignore the 1000 Thespians who also stayed and fought to the end at the other end of the pass.
There are approximately 30 minutes of fighting in the movie 300.
The DreamWorks movie 'Rise of the Guardians' was based on the book series, not the other way around. The film adaptation was set around 300 years after the book series was written.
No, 300 is based on a true story; the spartan pit is not real.
300 was the movie based on the battle of Thermopolaye. It took place on Thermopolaye pass, hence the name.
Xerxes The story will be the same heft as '300' but it cover a much, much greater span of time -- it's 10 years, not three days… This is a more complex story. The story is so much larger. The Spartans in '300' were being enclosed by the page as the world got smaller. This story has truly vast subjects. The Athenian naval fleet, for instance, is a massive artistic undertaking and it dwarfed by the Persian fleet, which is also shown in this story. The story has elements of espionage, too, and it's a sweeping tale with gods and warriors.
The Battle of Thermopylae in the Ancient Greek Wars against the Persian Empire. it deals with the valiant stand of the 300 Spartans and tends to ignore the 1000 Thespians who also stayed and fought to the end at the other end of the pass.
buy a do and he will make a Lexus TRUE stOrY
National Treasure.......No, that's completely fictional. 300 however, while it has some fictional elements, it is based on the real life Battle of Thermopylae in 480 b.c.
There are approximately 30 minutes of fighting in the movie 300.
The name of the movie with the 300 skit is called Epic Movie.
The DreamWorks movie 'Rise of the Guardians' was based on the book series, not the other way around. The film adaptation was set around 300 years after the book series was written.
The movie was a fictionalized account of an actual historical event.It's incredibly fictionalized, however - and the movie isn't remotely similar to what happened in real life. The biggest difference being that in real life "the 300" - were slaughtered - none survived.It's best to think of Hollywood movies that are based on real events as a type of, "What if it had happened this way" story, and to not accept anything at face value.Documentaries are, in theory, supposed to be accurate depictions of real events. Even these however are often very skewed and misrepresented.A movie made for entertainment that is "based on a real event" can by-and-large be accepted as, "This event actually happened, and that's about all the accurate information we're going to use."
His favorite movie is 300.
great movie!