Yes, he wears a wig. If you look at his films before he took a break from acting ie. Insaniyat etc. you'll see that he had fairly waspy hair and was thinning. Equally if you take a look at Mrityudaata its fairly obvious that he started off with a poor wig. This followed in a few films until Baghban onwards when the piece looked more authentic. The giveaway is the back of the head where if you look carefully you can see where the wig meets natural hair - in line with the ears. The hairpiece in Waqt and in fact Kyun Ho gaya Naa were the most obvious. Also note carefully that he has no actual parting! You can't see any scalp in his parting at all. That's only because its a hairpiece. There aren't many people who keep a full head to that age save for the likes of Shatrughan Sinha perhaps! Even Dharmendra is sporting a weave to cover his rear bald patch.
Chat with our AI personalities
yes......amitabh bachchan does were a wig....and not from the recent past..i suppose his last move without wig was Akeyla ( 1990) and then he took a sabbatical for almost 4 years and then got ready to cover up his bald head with a WIG....................and thats how we see him these days....NITIN KANDYA
I think yes, because he appears having frontal baldness in his films in 2007 etc. & now he is having full hair in his head.So it should be a wig or hair replantation.
No. Hrithik Roshan does not wear any wig. He is having natural hair which look good. He is a hardworker and avoid any shortcuts so he is not a fan of wigs or anything.
1000 rupees
No amitabh bachchan is not srivastava. He is just bachchan and is famous. His father's name was harivansh rai bachchan.
Amitabh Bachchan Corporation was created in 1995.
Federer has more money than amitabh bachchan. This is because federer gets paid in dollars. Amitabh is paid in rupee which is smaller than dollar.
Amitabh played the character of Jai Dev